Subject:  (Burke) Insurance company concerns.....
Date:     Thu, 15 Apr 1999 212329 -0500 (CDT)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org>
--------------------------------------------------


Apropos the recent messages about insurance company concerns....

I found the following in some old files -- nearly a year ago.....

Jennie, are you still with us???.....

Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
rbeavers@llion.org................
...It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness... 
.................PEOPLE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN PROFITS...............

     _________________________________________________________________
   
From: "Roy L. Beavers"   
Reply-To: "Roy L. Beavers" 
To: emfguru@hotmail.com
Subject: cellphones/insurance
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 19:06:30 -0500 (CDT)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 09:43:18 +1000
From: Jennie Burke 
To: rbeavers@llion.org
Subject: cellphones

Dear Roy,

Reading all the info about calcium with great interest.  Would certainly
like to get the methodology for the mononuclear WBC magnesium test if
possible.

However, my comment is regarding cell phones and some of the likely outcomes
for human health there.  I have been told by an acquaintance in Australia
(who is head of one of our largest insurance companies) that there certainly
is an awareness amongst insurance companies of the approach of litigation as
claims begin to flow in over health damage by the use of mobile phones.
This particular company in Australia has already written up a no-claim for
emf's in the fine print of their policies.  In fact, Lloyd's of London are
apparently stating that when the floodgates open on these claims many
insurance companies will go to the wall as it will be bigger than asbestosis.

Ciao

Jennie







Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html