Subject:  (Kirsch) cable-mounted type transceivers and antennas (fwd)
Date:     Sun, 18 Apr 1999 165006 -0500 (CDT)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org>
--------------------------------------------------


......."Cable mounted benefits?"......  A game of "smoking mirrors???"....
It looks to me like you will still have the RFR and MW transmissions form
the antennas in your vicinity......

Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
rbeavers@llion.org................
...It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness... 
.................PEOPLE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN PROFITS...............

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 17:19:59 -0400
From: ackirsch@capecod.net
To: rbeavers@llion.org
Subject: cable-mounted type transceivers and antennas

Hi,
We in Wellfleet, Massachusetts are seeking hard information on benefits (as
in lower risks to our health) of cable-mounted type transceivers and
antennas (a.k.a. PCS-over-Cable or PCS-over-Fiber) technologies as opposed
to base towers and antennas. 
We need this during the coming week if possible. 
Thanks,
Arlene Kirsch



Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html