Subject:  A net current control application (Maxey)...
Date:     Sat, 7 Aug 1999 110642 -0500 (CDT)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" 
To:       emfguru 
--------------------------------------------------

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 1999 10:45:51 -0500
From: Edward Maxey 
To: Deborah McDermott ,
    "Roy L. Beavers" ,
    Scarlett 
Subject: A net current control application

Hello again Deborah,

Your email to Roy Beavers has now had a number of informed and some
technically
correct remedial responses.  This little note hopes to employ
simplicity.

You wrote:
>The only situation whereby the emf levels declined significantly was
when I had an
>electrician disconnect the ground wire from the fuse box.  All the
readings shot down
>to acceptable levels (under 2mg).

This simply shows that the ground wire, when connected, is carrying a
current which
is returning to an electric utility distribution transformer.  You could
arrange an
impediment around this ground wire so that the current would take other
routes back to
the transformer.  Your electrician could splice one end of an insulated
wire segment to
the disconnected ground wire, wind the insulated segment 11-13 turns
about a laminated
silicon steel core, and connect the other end back to the fuse box.
Such a core need not
be large.  It could come from a blown transformer out of a junk shop.

This remedy is easy to prove.  Just try it.

If Canadian electric codes are like those in the United States there
will be no prohibition
as to the pathway the ground wire takes so long as it is metallically
bonded in compliance
to the codes.  In this case you are simply rearranging the ground wire's
pathway.

Please let me know if this helps.

Cordially,
Ed Maxey


Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com