Subject:  Re EMFs considered a pollution? (Karow) (Mueller)... (fwd)
Date:     Tue, 10 Aug 1999 144549 -0500 (CDT)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" 
To:       emfguru 
--------------------------------------------------

.......The line which separates "chemical-biological action" and
"electrical-biological action" exists only in OUR minds.....  Mother
Nature makes no such distinction.....  Both can be toxic.....

Roy Beavers (EMFguru)......
rbeavers@llion.org.......
.....It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness.....
EMF-L web-site can be found at: 
EMF-L archives can be found at: 
..................PEOPLE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN PROFITS..................

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 15:40:09 EDT
From: JCMPelican@aol.com
To: rbeavers@llion.org
Subject: Re: EMFs considered a pollution? (Karow)...

Hans   -    I am certain you will receive a professional response but for
what it's worth, there is a book in our library entitled "Toxins from A to Z"
and the most recent issue does discuss EMR.  I tried to photocopy and wasn't
successful but can go over and take notes if you are interested.   Do no
recall reference to the word "pollution" per se but.......      Joanne
Mueller/Minneapolis, Mn


Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com