Subject:  Australia Media Release - Info on SAR Emissions 
Date:     Wed, 02 Aug 2000 082453 -0500
From:     Roy Beavers 
To:       Roy Beavers 
--------------------------------------------------

.........Response from EMF-L.........

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Australia Media Release - Info on SAR Emissions (Benson)(Kwee)..
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:29:17 +0200
From: "Brian Wasserman" 
To: 
References: <3987FABF.A0C07432@emfguru.com>


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Australia Media Release - Info on SAR Emissions (Benson)..
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 12:30:50 +0200
From: "Sianette Kwee" 
To: 
References: <3987E762.948ACDBA@emfguru.com> <3987E8C4.310EF2F3@emfguru.com>

**This is good news and a big step forward. However, it is not sufficient
only
**to state emission levels of the mobile phones, if the consumer does not
know
**what it involves. People will still continue buying phones with high
**emission levels, because they might be cheaper or people think it is
of no
**importance.

If you use a simple gaussmeter to measure radiation output from a
variety of
cell phones in "stand by" mode, the reading averages between 1,5 and 3
milligauss. Let's say  that 3 milligauss is border line, one may then assume
that an emission of 1,5 milligauss is safe. Wrong!!!  This is 1,5 milligauss
of  radiation continually entering your body. Multiply 1.5 over 1 hour and
you will have 90 milligauss entering your body, I hardly think that this is
safe.

When you start measuring cell phones in talk mode, they are all the same,
"Dangerous"

In health

Brian Wasserman
RA*D*AR Electromagnetic Stabilizer
"Complete Protection" From Electromagnetic Radiation
Increases the Immune System
bw@radar3.com
www.radar3.com


Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com