Subject:  Dr. Henry Lai's correction......
Date:     Sat, 6 Dec 1997 052857 -0600 (CST)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@mail.llion.org>
To:       emfguru@hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------

Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=iso-8859-1
Content-ID: 

Hi everybody:

I am pleased to forward Dr. Lai's correction below.  

Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
rbeavers@llion.org..............http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html
................................It is better to light a single candle ...
than to curse the darkness...............................................

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 1997 18:17:29 +0000
From: Christopher Beaver 
To: rbeavers@mail.llion.org
Subject: Correction...

Dear Roy Beavers:

Extremely important correction to my note of yesterday. In fact, in my
discussion of Henry Lai’s beliefs, I was incorrect in my
characterization of what he believes. I have attached his correction to
me to be completely clear. He believes there ARE distinctions between
the effects of extremely low frequencies and radiofrequencies. He is
beginning to believe that there is not much difference in effect among
different radiofrequencies. 

I apologize to everyone for my misunderstanding. The fault is entirely
mine and not Dr. Lai’s. Since Dr. Lai’s work is so respected in the
field of electromagnetic research, I would be devastated if any
aspersion were cast on Dr. Lai through my error. The fault is entirely
mine.

Thank you for the opportunity to make this correction. 

Sincerely, Christopher Beaver

HLAI@BEMRL.BIOENG.WASHINGTON.EDU wrote:
> 
> Dear Christopher,
> 
> Somebody forwarded to me your letter to Roy Beavers, in which
>  you mentioned that I was beginning to believe that there was no
>  distinction between "electromagnetic fields (power line, etc) and
>  electromagnetic radiation (cell phone towers, etc)."  I think that is
> a misunderstanding. I want to clarify that I am beginning to believe
>  that there is not much distinction between different frequencies of
>  radiofrequency radiation in producing biological effects, but not
>  between extremely-low frequency fields (e.g., power line
>  frequency) and radiofrequency radiation.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Henry Lai

Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html