Subject: ELF biological response (fwd) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 103211 -0600 (CST) From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@mail.llion.org> To: emfguru@hotmail.com -------------------------------------------------- Hi everybody: I have been given permission to forward the following interesting study result. NOTE!! The date was 1975!!! To mu knowledge, the current research has not revealed any familiarity with this research...... Though, it could have some relevance to the very revealing report given by Charles Graham (of MRI Research in Kansas City) at the San Diego Meeting ... which I have previously cited to you..... Cheerio....... Roy Beavers (EMFguru) rbeavers@llion.org..............http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html ................................It is better to light a single candle ... than to curse the darkness............................................... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 18:33:24 -0800 From: Edward MaxeyTo: rbeavers@mail.llion.org Subject: ELF biological response Dear Roy Beavers, Here is a reference for you. E. S. Maxey, "Critical Aspects of Human Versus Terrestrial Electromagnetic Symbiosis" In Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Waves, Selected Papers of the USNC/URSI Annual Meeting, Boulder, CO (1975) A solenoid was placed beneath the pillow in a clinical EEG laboratory. EMFs of 10 to 1,000+ nanotesla were applied at frequencies between 3 and 35 hertz. About 10% of a small test sample showed driving of brain rhythms with EMFs as low as 30 nanotesla. The amplitude of the recorded driven brain waves did not vary with variations of the applied driving signal. The driven brain would closely track the frequency of the applied signal. The recording pens did not allow study in the 50-60 hertz range so the study has no powerful statememt to make about powerline EMFs. ***It only showed that very subtle ELF EMFs can evoke a biological response.*** [Guru's italics.] Living things are very sensitive to all sorts of terrestrial signals - 60 hertz being a newcomer on the planet may have both beneficial and harmful biological effects. We know something about the latter from numerous epidemiological studies. Thought you would like to know, Ed Maxey .- Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html