Subject: Qualcom cellphone (fwd)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 160013 -0600 (CST)
From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To: emfguru@hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------
Hi everybody:
Here is another interesting message from Bert....
I am terribly ***disturbed*** at what I am hearing about Kjell Hansson
Mild "retractions." (Have heard from other sources as well.)
I "think" I know him from having met him more than once. That just
doesn't sound like him!!!!
Someone who knows him better than I do should ask him to give us a
clarification ... to set the record straight. (Sometimes erroneous
statements get circulated without anyone really being entirely to blame.)
Cheerio.....
Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
rbeavers@llion.org..............http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html
................................It is better to light a single candle ...
than to curse the darkness...............................................
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 16:11:20 -0500
From: Bertha Dumpe
To: Rbeavers@llion.org
Subject: Qualcom cellphone
(436.3 7-23-1997)) id 852565B0.00752F43 ; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 16:19:58 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: WORLDBANK
Roy: Read De Pippos EMs. Mighty strong 'english.' Well at least someone's
upset. That's what it takes to move mountains.
Re the 'internal' antenna. Be advised that antennas have always been
internal to cell/PCS phone The aerial, which merely adjusts the quality of
an incoming signal, has always been external. Manufacturers know that
PEOPLE REACT TO WHAT THEY SEE or hear. People know that the aerial potrudes
from a region slightly above the ear and sticks out above the head. The
area of the brain where people develop malignant (and sometimes graciously
benign) tumore is in the vicinity of the ear where the aerial exists the
phone! Rarely is a tumor found in the vicinity above the ear region from
the center to the tip of the aerial Why? Because the transmitter (or
transceiver) of the cell/PCS phone is near the earpiece. In fact often
people now use their cell/PCS phone WITHOUT EXTENDING THE AERIAL. One
person told me, "There is no difference in quality with or without the
aerial in or out."
So in the case of new phones the manufacturer has merely eliminated the
aerial, and put an signal amplication chip at or near the internal (has
always been so) transmitter (transceiver). This should mean more tumors at
a faster rate, depending on the length of time people use the phones (which
Kjell Hansson Mild retracted). [***guru comment above***] Some other time
will discuss why cell/PCS phone users sense HEAT around the ear and skull.
Not now. De Pippo has already experienced enough for one day. But
guaranteed, this is the greatest shyster deal of all times.
. The new Qualcom (see internet at Qualcomm.com) phones, as well as those
of other manufacturers, are designed to operate in 2 modes, analog (800
MHz) or digital, (1.9 GHz) because technology is dynamic. Such phones could
give users 'seamless' access to cell/PCS tower antennas wherever they
'roam' and of course users will be happy because they do no need to invest
in new phones. The CDMA phones will be picked up by LEO satellites roaming
the sky. Happy? But new phones may harbor another "advantage." That is, the
PCS signal, which cannot travel far (reason for so many microwave towers),
can be propelled greater distances by bouncing (or boosting) 1.9 - 2.5 GHz
(PCS) from the crisper long distance traveler 800 MHz cellular frequency.
To get systems in place no matter what, industry is fooling the public by
doing such things as camouflaging microwave towers and installing PCS etc.
along highways and electric company rights of way. Industry is determined
that the economy must get first preference at all costs to public health.
In the end the government will pay because it has promoted the industry. I
agree with your description of the US VICE PRESIDENT. Could not have been
better. He, above all, is responsible for the present public exposure
situation.
Yes, some researchers know the problem. But unfortunately each researcher
is so specialized that they cannot grasp the full picture. And now we just
put in office a Surgeon General who knows nothing about EMR. Convenience,
or chance?
Bert
Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html