Subject:  (Beal) (Pritchett) (Lundquist) Mind Control (fwd)
Date:     Thu, 11 Feb 1999 212655 -0600 (CST)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org>
--------------------------------------------------


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 14:26:19 EST
From: EMFEFFECTS@aol.com
To: rbeavers@llion.org
Cc: robertp@scm-ae.com, w-m-a@reach.net, marjlundquist@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: (Pritchett) (Lundquist) Mind Control (fwd)

Marilyn, Roy, Wolfgang:

For induction of simple oscilloscope images into human brain/visual system,
see Reference 5 in the Reference area of my website
.  Don't know if Dr. Rauscher and Bill Bise have
a patent on this approach yet...

You should be aware (reported in detail abstracts on Roy's guru email last
year) that they did some good (and lab confirmed) research around 1974-76 on
extremely low level microwave effects (900 MHz and 2 GHz)  on a small number
of people, male and female,  less than 10, and got physiologically subjective
syptoms and brainwave effects...these were frequencies at powers far less than
microwave towers routinely emit. I have their papers but have to be gone for
awhile today..just wanted to get a response out to you all immediately that
there is substantial info about, and no doubt that sound and light can be
induced into the brain...the sound can be detailed and directed...i don't know
details about the complexity of visual induction of images into the brain, but
can assume more has been done that the preliminary work of Dr. Rauscher.
....now about reading one's thoughts.......that's a whole nother issue and I
have no info on that....

For induction of sound, voices, and music into the human auditory system see
Reference 22 of my website    (I have personal
experience with this one thru investigation and testing the Flanagan
Neurophone...at least two patents on this one....Flanagan and Puharich,  I
have known all the persons mentioned in this email at least 20 years and kept
up with their "creative edge" work.

I have the highest respect for Dr. Persinger's work.  I hope to meet him for a
few hours when in Toronto to give a paper at an EMF symposium there in March.

Regards to all

Jim Beal
EMF Interface Consulting

#######

Subj:	 (Scherer) (Lundquist) Mind Control (fwd)
Date:	2/11/99 12:39:10 PM Central Standard Time
From:	rbeavers@llion.org (Roy L. Beavers)
To:	rbeavers@llion.org (emfguru)

Hi Everybody:

.......Below, Wolfgang reminds us of the Russian use of EMF
against the U.S. Embassy in Moscow.....That is a matter of historical
record.....The Congress of the U.S. has even held hearings about
that activity......However, there is reason to believe that the U.S.
still has not told the full story about that subject to its citizens.....

(To me).....It is not so much that the recent flurry of 'rumors' 
about microwave (or other) electronic intrusions into the public's
"brain" ... are untrue.....  I don't know whether they are true or
not???.....But I don't want this list to become a source for spreading
***unsubstantiated*** information ... on any subject.......

The Moscow activity is very well substantiated -- though not fully
told, I agree......

Cheerio.....

Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
rbeavers@llion.org................
...It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness... 
.................PEOPLE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN PROFITS...............

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 13:03:24 +0000
From: w-m-a@reach.net
To: "Roy L. Beavers" 
Cc: marjorie lundquist 
Subject: Re: (Lundquist) Mind Control (fwd)

Everybody who has doubt about the existence of this technology 
should get a copy of the CBC Undercurrent program.

they showed the test LIVE in Sudbury Ontario Canada
 with Dr. Persinger there
also they took themselves a test in Russia with the Russian Professor 
also the have the interview with the American Scientists.

Those and the Russian expert clearly stated that this technology was 
used at WACO and probably in the Golf war  
despite no one "in charge" confirmed the use 
but also nobody "in charge"  denied it
the FACTS pointed to it  as they  showed  
the related pictures from the war 
and again this judgment is based on your own US experts opinion.
 
But of course it is all "classified silence"

Please Roy  - tell you the CBC  yourself
if you think their documentary is bogus in your opinion
the "dark science" is always classified and hidden
however, you accept the Microwave beam into the
 US embassy in Moscow, what was it good (or bad) for ?

Greetings


Wolfgang W. Scherer

http://www.reach.net/~scherer/p/

Join the EMF mailing list contact Roy Beavers
rbeavers@llion.org 
visit http://wwe.fem.se/




#######

In a message dated 2/11/99 12:41:12 PM Central Standard Time,
rbeavers@llion.org writes:

<< Subj:	 (Pritchett) (Lundquist) Mind Control (fwd)
 Date:	2/11/99 12:41:12 PM Central Standard Time
 From:	rbeavers@llion.org (Roy L. Beavers)
 To:	rbeavers@llion.org (emfguru)
 
 
 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 10:22:33 -0800
 From: "Robert L. Pritchett" 
 To: "Roy L. Beavers" 
 Subject: RE: (Lundquist) Mind Control (fwd)
 
 Well, I don't think it is so much mind "control" as mental intrusion by some
 frequency of radiowave. Maybe Bill Curry knows which frequencies  (EKG
 readings?) are the ones that can "invade" our brains/minds/thoughts or maybe
 they have been posted to this forum before.  I've not paid too much
 attention to the "control" aspects as discussed on other forums, maybe
 because they smack of "Art Bellism".  I do however, believe that our bodies
 get invaded by frequencies (high squeal in the ears for a time). Which ones
 are the ones that most "frequently" (pun intended) really affect us for
 short periods of time vs those that can adversely affect our cells for long
 term duration?
 
 I'm familiar with those EMF aspects caused by TV/Monitor high-voltage issues
 that cause leukemia. I've been attempting to rediscover those that "hurt" us
 in the cellular and wireless spectrums.
 
 Wouldn't it be nice if someone put a signal light (red/yellow/green) next to
 a radio frequency chart so we could readily "see" which frequencies are the
 ones we need to be wary of?
 
 Robert (learning wireless dangers) Pritchett
 
 
 
 
 
 



Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html