Subject:  (Bertrand) Fluoride/EMF.....
Date:     Fri, 5 Feb 1999 032907 -0600 (CST)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org>
--------------------------------------------------


........In the message below, Dr. Bertrand has summarized a much longer
article which he had previously sent......In the past, other readers have
raised this same question???.......I would also remind everybody that
the possible _interaction_ of EMF with other chemicals/substances (to
the detriment of good health) is an idea that has much credibility within
the EMF research community, though it has been the subject of very little
actual study.......guru......

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 10:39:03 +0200
From: "Frank Bertrand." 
To: Roy Beavers 
Cc: "\"HAROLD SIMPSON\" <" 
Subject: Fluoride/EMF

Dear Guru,
Re: the nefarious conduct of various academics;scientists;politicians;civil
servants; business people etc..
Lying, misinformation, falsification of figures etc., has been done for
over 50 years by fluoridationists.
A dental surgery must emit a lot of EMF, magnets of the same polarity were
used in opposing artificial teeth to improve retention; transmitters are
put into the mouth, specifically the teeth, for various reasons, e.g.
communication; and electrical and magnetic techniques are used for cleaning
teeth.
EMF is said to increase the activity of the fluoride ion (F) in the brain,
so why not elsewhere in the body?   Gene Mesco of Berkley University,
California, showed that F enabled alumiuium to cross the blood brain
barrier, and suggested this caused Alzheimer's disease.
The Argonne and Oregon National Laboratories of the USA, both stated that F
was carcinogenic, in 1988.
Toothpaste generally contains 1000-1500 p.p.m. F, but topical F put
directly on teeth, contains 19 400 p.p.m. F(1). It is in a child's mouth
for 2-4 minutes 2-3 times a year; it is ingested, inhaled, and absorbed
from the mouth, and the child is instructed to have nothing in the mouth
for an hour afterwards.
Mouth cancer, which used to be seen in elderly men and rarely in women, is
now increasing dramatically
in the under 50's, especially women. Smoking is being blamed, but prior to
1950, mouth and lung cancers, and coronaries, were comparatively rare,
although millions of people smoked billions of cigarettes; and these
increases have co-incided with the marked increase of F in water, food,
etc..
Two USA journalists (2), using the freedom of information act of the USA,
revealed that it takes millions of tons of F to make an atomic bomb; and
there were terrible affects on people, animals and crops, in the state of
New Jersey in 1943, where it was being produced. The cause was F poisoning.
 The USA government was terrified of being sued for billions of dollars,
and were advised by Dr. Harold C. Hodge to tell the people that F was good
for the teeth, put it in the drinking water, and secretly monitor it.  This
was and still is done, and is backed by outright lying and falsification of
figures.
The USA government also knew that F had an affect on the brain, as for
instance it can cause hyperexcitability in the young and docility or
apathy, in adults (most of the serious rioting in USA cities, was in the
fluoridated cities), (3).
Docility or apathy, is very useful to enable politicians to get away with
bad conduct.
References:
 1."Fluorides and Oral Health", WHO technical report series, 846, Geneva,
1994.
 2."Fluoride, Teeth and the Atomic Bomb", Messrs. Joel Griffiths, and Chris
Bryson, July 1997;- available on the internet.
 3." A Tale of 21 Cities", F.R.Bertrand, "THE PROBE", London, England, May
1973.
Your's sincerely,
Frank Bertrand.



Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html