--------------------------------------------------
--------------A2F1CC17E8952BCCDBFE2ED6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi folks:
You will see when you read the note below that I have defied the
instructions I was given. I have forwarded the message in spite
of the senders wish that I not do so!!! I hope he/she will forgive......
But it is simply an OUTRAGE!! And, indeed, how TRUE it is!!!
And how COMMONPLACE it is in the U.S. today......
And ... the public has a right to know....!!!
We think we have government (or somebody) setting proper safety
standards and monitoring those standards to protect public health and
safety.....??!! .....In foods, drugs, meats, tires, etc......
Like HELL we do......!!!! Read on..... The story is TOO typical......
And it sure FITS what we know about the RF/MW/ELF Blue World
doesn't it, Lookout Mountain.......???
BTW sender --the answer to your question is that there is ABSOLUTELY
NO monitoring of the Blue World.........
Cheerio......
Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
roy@emfguru.com
http://emfguru.com
PEOPLE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN PROFIT$$$$
> Hello Roy,I was brousing through the WEB trying to find the A.N.S.I Standard
> that deals with telecommunication frequencies. I'm somewhat familiar with
> A.N.S.I. standards because from about 1979 to 1990, I was a licensed optician
> and manufacturer of spectacle lenses. We used the A.N.S.I. Z-80 standard
> covering impact resistance of crown glass spectacle lenses. The irony of that
> standard was the method by which the lenses had to be tested after manufacture
> and hardening for impact resistance. First, the lens had to be chemically
> hardened (a process that took overnight in a special oven in a special
> chemical solution) or air hardened (the lens was suspended in a piece of
> eqipment that blew hot air on both sides of the lens for a specified period of
> time based upon the center thickness of the lens. The test for impact
> resistance required that the lens be placed on a drop ball tester. Without
> going into the technical numbers, the lens had to withstand the impact from a
> steel ball of a specified diameter and weight dropped from a specified
> height. Enforcement of this standard was always a "grey" area. Never once
> did an inspector come to my laboratory and ask me if I had drop ball tested
> the lenses. Never was one of my patients contacted to have their lens drop
> ball tested by an enforcer of the standard. I heard other opticians at
> optical conventions making jokes about using their drop ball testers as "coat
> racks." I pass along this story to ask you how the A.N.S.I. standards for
> cellular transmission tower radiation is measured once the tower is up and who
> measures it, how often, and how is the measurement documented? Perhaps you
> can give me some insight. I'd appreciate it if you would not pass along my
> message to anyone else. Thanks for respecting the confidentiality.
>
>
>
--------------A2F1CC17E8952BCCDBFE2ED6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi folks:
You will see when you read the note below that I have defied the
instructions I was given. I have forwarded the message in spite
of the senders wish that I not do so!!! I hope he/she will forgive......
But it is simply an OUTRAGE!! And, indeed, how TRUE it is!!!
And how COMMONPLACE it is in the U.S. today......
And ... the public has a right to know....!!!
We think we have government (or somebody) setting proper safety
standards and monitoring those standards to protect public health and
safety.....??!! .....In foods, drugs, meats, tires, etc......
Like HELL we do......!!!! Read on..... The story is TOO
typical......
And it sure FITS what we know about the RF/MW/ELF
Blue World
doesn't it, Lookout Mountain.......???
BTW sender --the answer to your question is that there is ABSOLUTELY
NO monitoring of the Blue World.........
Cheerio......
Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
roy@emfguru.com
http://emfguru.com
PEOPLE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN PROFIT$$$$
Hello Roy,I
was brousing through the WEB trying to find the A.N.S.I Standard that deals
with telecommunication frequencies. I'm somewhat familiar with A.N.S.I.
standards because from about 1979 to 1990, I was a licensed optician and
manufacturer of spectacle lenses. We used the A.N.S.I. Z-80 standard
covering impact resistance of crown glass spectacle lenses. The irony
of that standard was the method by which the lenses had to be tested after
manufacture and hardening for impact resistance. First, the lens
had to be chemically hardened (a process that took overnight in a special
oven in a special chemical solution) or air hardened (the lens was suspended
in a piece of eqipment that blew hot air on both sides of the lens for
a specified period of time based upon the center thickness of the lens.
The test for impact resistance required that the lens be placed on a drop
ball tester. Without going into the technical numbers, the lens had
to withstand the impact from a steel ball of a specified diameter and weight
dropped from a specified height. Enforcement of this standard was
always a "grey" area. Never once did an inspector come to my laboratory
and ask me if I had drop ball tested the lenses. Never was one of
my patients contacted to have their lens drop ball tested by an enforcer
of the standard. I heard other opticians at optical conventions making
jokes about using their drop ball testers as "coat racks." I pass
along this story to ask you how the A.N.S.I. standards for cellular transmission
tower radiation is measured once the tower is up and who measures it, how
often, and how is the measurement documented? Perhaps you can give
me some insight. I'd appreciate it if you would not pass along
my message to anyone else. Thanks for respecting the confidentiality.
--------------A2F1CC17E8952BCCDBFE2ED6--
Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com