Subject:  (Gareau) some good news... (fwd)
Date:     Fri, 29 Jan 1999 134654 -0600 (CST)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org>
--------------------------------------------------


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:33:36 EST
From: GAREAUK@aol.com
To: rbeavers@llion.org
Subject: some good news...

Hi Roy...
Here's an update for you regarding our case.  I've been fighting a battle in
rural RI(Greene) with Nextel.  We found out in October that they want to put a
150 ft. cell tower in a seasonal campground on land that's zoned rural
residential and recreation, conservation and open space !  It's also directly
across the street from a 500+ federal wildlife preserve!  At the zoning
meeting on Nov. 4 Nextel had their lawyer  bring along a stenographer and 4
expert witnesses-just like Kirk Wines states on his web page, which is an
extremely valuable resource for people fighting these monstrosities
(www.cellslayer.com)- including a real estate appraiser who said that towers
don't depreciate the value of surrounding houses.  You just may have fewer
people interested in buying them once they see the tower. (duh)  We were
unprepared for the formal proceedings of that evening ( it was run just like a
mini-trial) and the neighbors raised some great points, but since we are not
experts our common sense opinions didn't really matter.  Testimony was closed
that night.  The zoning board requested some additional info. from Nextel and
sent the matter to the planning commission for a recommendation.  In the
meantime, the neighbors and abutters of the campground united and decided to
try to have testimony reopened.  We now call ourselves IMPACT-not only because
we feel every tower has an impact in every neighborhood or community it goes
in, but also because we are Intensely Motivated People Against Communications
Towers. (Don't laugh. It took all day to come up with this name.)  I also met
someone in another Rural, RI community via your web site(thank you very much)
who had just successfully shooed away Cellular One from his neighborhood.  He
gave me a lot of useful information, including the name of his appraiser, who
we did hire.  The impact study that Nextel was allowed to submit to our town
was done in Boston!(remember we live in a rural area with 2-5 acre zoning and
large wooded lots) They were allowed to submit into testimony an impact study
done in an industrial area in Boston where there was already an existing cell
tower. I felt it was grossly unfair to compare our beautiful surroundings to
such an urban area and I let everyone know it!  I wrote letters to the editors
of our local papers, to the zoning board members and town solicitor, and I
talked to the reporters from all 3 local papers. I gave them all the
information I have regarding cell towers, the Telecommunications Act....and
various web sites for them to look at.  They all wrote articles, basically
defending our position, trying to inform the public of what was happening. I
also read our towns Comprehensive Plan, which was extremely informative.  I
can't tell you how many times it refers to "preserving open space in its
natural state" and "preserving the character of our neighborhoods."  This is a
crucial bit of info. Every town or city has copies of its Comp. plan in the
local library.  People should research it extensively!  I was fortunate to
borrow a copy from a former planning commission member and another friend of
mine.  You can also purchase copies) I also had the minutes from the zoning
board and planning commission meetings regarding a similar case in our town in
1997 when Sprint was denied a tower in a residential neighborhood.  I used the
same reasons (where applicable) for denial in our argument in front of the
planning commission on Jan. 13.  Luckily the chairman of our planning
commission gave us an opportunity to speak and he actually respects people
with common sense so they did in fact vote to DENY (6-2) Nextel the special
use permit based on: depreciation of real estate values, not enough
alternative sites were looked at, and basically it doesn't belong in a
residential neighborhood (or something to that effect; this could be bad for
us later if they appeal, but I don't think they will.)  Now it gets even more
interesting...it was supposed to go back to zoning for a decision on Feb. 3
BUT the head of our zoning board passed away last week so they won't have a
quorum, therefore they can't vote.  As a result the public hearing will be
postponed to Mar. 3 where Nextel will have to start all over again! They can't
vote on it until the next month, which brings us to April. We are now prepared
for them.  We have 2 real estate experts, the appraiser and a friend who lives
about a mile from where the tower would be and an "expert" on our
comprehensive plan who will bring up discrepancies with the plan and this
tower.  He's the ex-planning commission member who happened to be the vice
chairman of the advisory committee when the comprehensive plan was being
written.  So things are looking up.  I think that Nextel may actually look for
a more appropriate site(not that there ever really is one) in  the middle of
the woods where no one can see it.  If you can't see it at least it won't ruin
the character of the neighborhood and it won't depreciate real estate values
so although I would rather live in a community with no towers, I realize
that's simply not possible at this time.  I'm sorry this is so long but this
case has been complicated from the start.  I think it's very important for
people to act a swiftly as possible when hearing of a proposed tower coming
into their neighborhood.  You absolutely have to:
Hire a real estate expert or experts(if a tower goes up it will absolutely
diminish the value of your property);
Read your comprehensive Plan or Tower ordinance and make copies for the zoning
board of any pertinent information;
Having a lawyer is nice, but not really necessary;
Be reasonable in your requests/concerns(Don't whine or get emotional, which is
hard sometimes);
Become familiar with the Telecommunications Act! Do not dwell on the health
effects!  I didn't even mention them at the planning commission meeting other
than the fact that just the perception that there might be a health risk can
automatically reduce your property values;
Have petitions all ready to hand in for the first meeting in case you get shut
out like we did(Get as many people to the meeting as possible but make sure
you tell them to be respectful at all times-even though you may want to punch
the people for the towers)
Make friends with your newspaper reporters and write letters to everybody!
Research everything!
GOOD LUCK!
Karen
PS sorry this is so long but i can't believe we won the first battle!



Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html