Subject:  (High) RE (Woodley) Re e-mail (fwd)
Date:     Thu, 28 Jan 1999 051819 -0600 (CST)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org>
--------------------------------------------------


......It seems that guru ("we") are getting Ingrid into some
difficulty.....guru.....

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:55:45 +0100
From: "High, Ingrid" 
To: "'Roy L. Beavers'" 
Subject: RE: (Woodley) Re: e-mail (fwd)

Dear Roy,
I would very much underline your last statement there. Before I started
being a member of this email list from my work-account - which was the
only one I had at the time - I asked my manager, and he said yes. But I
have clearly noticed that this is no more popular, so I have to be very
careful about it. It is not just using the firm's resources - but also
putting oneself in the "outcast persons" category by keeping in with
things like these. 

I have forwarded important fact-emails to various persons inside my firm
(health officer, doctor's office, trade union, professionals dealing
with telephone system, electricity etc) - and when I now am in the
middle of a work conflict I have been advised by the health-officer and
trade union to stop showing that I am getting emails from you (so I take
them out on paper and read at home).

So please let us not judge to harshly.

with warm greetings, and wishing you and all a happy new year,
Ingrid High

>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Roy L. Beavers [SMTP:rbeavers@llion.org]
>Sent:	Thursday, January 28, 1999 1:44 AM
>To:	emfguru
>Subject:	(Woodley) Re: e-mail (fwd)
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:41:10 -0500
>From: "Richard W.  Woodley" 
>To: "Roy L. Beavers" 
>Subject: Re: e-mail (fwd)
>
>
> 	I am not overly surprised. I am the only one left of our original
>group of
>activists still dealing with this issue. Mind you our battle lasted over
>five years and I don`t particularly blame people for wanting to get on with
>their lives, so to speak. In this particular case the reference to "I am
>having problems with the personal e-mails at work" may also have something
>to do with it.
>
>At 08:06 AM 1999-01-27 -0600, you wrote:
>>
>>.......Following is forwarded for everyone to see......It just doesn't
>>seem right, does it?......That the result of our efforts to help people
>>should cause them to drop us (not help other people) when they win their
>>case???.......guru......(P.S. There have been other messages like this.)
>>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 13:30:11 +0200
>>From: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Reply-To: <@global.co.za>
>>To: "Roy L. Beavers" 
>>Subject: Re: e-mail
>>
>>Dear Roy L. Beavers,
>>
>>Please could you take my e-mail number off your address book.  I have won
>>my case against a tower being put up in my neighborhood and have collected
>>much new information.  I am having problems with the personal e-mails at
>>work and will contact you should another problem arise.
>>
>>Thank you for including me on your mailing list this last month.  It really
>>helped tremendously.
>>
>>Have a wonderful year.
>
>
>********************* Richard W. Woodley *********************       
>woodley@igs.net *********** http://www.ncf.carleton.ca/~ab190/       
>--------------------------------------------------------------       
> Bridlewood Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) Information Service     
>            http://www.ncf.ca/bridlewood-emfinfo/          



Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html