Subject: (Scherer) Re (Lundquist) Provincetown, MA, meeting (fwd) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 143956 -0600 (CST) From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org> To: emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org> -------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 14:40:49 +0000 From: "Wolfgang W. Scherer"To: "Roy L. Beavers" Subject: Re: (Lundquist) Provincetown, MA, meeting (fwd) Thanks Marjorie for digging this up, I have another Osepchuk paper in my References at my site. Containing similar contradictions. Also I fully agree with your evaluation, it only underlines again, that current Standards are set much too high especially if those findings are considered, published decades ago . The same goes for the levels of microwave hearing I used to calculate my equivalent threshold level published in the 70s. MicroWaves and other EMFs have not become more benign or less harmful since then, but much more "plentiful" It shows again, how some people disregard their own research data of that time only to protect their job/family/livelihood; some even admitted to that - but only privately and off the record. and beg for understanding - at the same time asking those without high priced jobs to go to battle - while they do the "back-stabbing" as they are paid for. So much for honesty - and all those industry people are higher paid than most public servants - some even better than the US President. So what can we expect? Hoping for a honest judge - whose appointment is made by politicians, who can only run for office with "big" money backing them ........all our western democracies seem to need a severe overhaul..... Greetings Wolfgang Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html