Subject:  Check$ & Balances (fwd)
Date:     Tue, 7 Jul 1998 123309 -0500 (CDT)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru@hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 10:21:23 -0700
From: Robert Pritchett RCDD LAN Specialist 
To: "Roy L. Beavers" 
Subject: Check$ & Balances

Roy: thanks for indulging my ego;

A play on words;

"Nothing measured, nothing gained".

The key for moving forward with the EMF studies is finding enough of the
"right" parameters so measurements are meaningful. From what I've seen so
far on this email list, we have some tantalizing clues, but we haven't
pulled the "correct" information yet from the database, right?

As others have stated so eloquently and in more verbiage, "facts & data make
the difference".

Roy;

Which parameters are most promising today?

Can the "charts & graphs" gathered so far, be posted at the web site that
was referenced yesterday?

The 'Net resources available to us now and in this excellent cadre of
brainpower on this email list ought to be brought forward with the
information as a baseline without us having to rely on government entities
and "organizations" to spoonfeed us with irrelevant, out-of-date and perhaps
otherwise bogus information.

Robert P.






Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html