Subject: Re gill desease (fwd)
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 222547 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To: emfguru@hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 23:11:29 +0000
From: "Wolfgang W. Scherer"
Reply-To: w-m-a@reach.net
To: "D. S. Cvijovic"
Cc: "Roy L. Beavers"
Subject: Re: gill desease
From: Self
To: "D. S. Cvijovic"
Subject: Re: gill desease
Copies to: "Roy L. Beavers"
Send reply to: w-m-a@reach.net
Date sent: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 21:59:37
> From: "D. S. Cvijovic"
> To:
> Subject: gill desease
> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 15:31:18 +0200
>
> Dear Wolfgang,
> I have not been at my computer for some days. I see that you have
> been active at Mr. Beaver's liist, meanwhile!? The reason I am
> writting this time to you is the recent List posting about the
> desease with fish in Iceland... I was thinking what would you say -
> how is it possible that EMF influences through the water... Except
> if they do not apply EMFs localy!? Best regards, Drasko
>
Hi Drasko,
EMFs work underwater, a little different depending especially on
frequency. However microwaves and all higher frequency EMFs are very
strongly dampened /absorbed in water ( this is why a microwave oven
works) - it also depends on the water "thickness as you experienced
yourself. This is the reason way they use "Super-Longwave" for
submarine communications, those have the least "loss" in water.
In regards to fish and EMF the problem has many faces. I had such a
question from British Columbia here in Canada. There a "fish kill"
moved South through a valley and some people thought this may be
caused by cell phone towers. However, the reason for such fish kills
is mostly chemical, however it is a possibility that something in the
food chain or environment went "crazy" due to the increased EMF
there. I have not enough specific data on Iceland to seriously
evaluate the situation.
The frogs world wide seems to die from a very common fungus.
However my wife as a biologist asked if this could be quite the
other way around and the fungus is kind of a symbiont to the frog and
stopped doing his "beneficial " function - and this is killing the
frog , since young ones are not affected despite carrying the fungus.
And if this may be caused by a too high EMF "noise".
She was put up to that by the fact that during an "electrical" day
(thunderstorm) yeast dough ( yeast is a fungus too ) won't properly
rise - as known for centuries!!!!. Quite a remarkable observation
with a lot of merits.
The increased EMF radiation and much more the increased
noise pollution and chemical pollution of the oceans in consequence of
the satellite navigation ( no more narrow navigation routes) are in
my opinion much more a reason for problem in the fish resources. Also
that some use "remote" ocean area to dump "problem" garbage. The fish
in the oceans have no sanctuary left - like all people on earth
won't find an EMF free spot either anymore.
However the direct application of EMF in Iceland with the subsequent
outbreak are one serious fact - that needs some clarification - what
type of EMF was applied - and especially wether the fish or the
virus are affected by the EMF - or both. Also in fish hatcheries
the "gene-Pool" is very limited too - another possible factor!!
In Minnesota where the frogs not only died in large numbers
but also developed many deformities - it is the Minnesota water ,
but nothing could be found in the water - however, when they used any
other water, the tadpoles developed normally. But water from any
Minnesota sources seems to have the same effect !!
( according to an article by the Department of Natural Resources)
What a wonderful world ................
Greetings
Wolfgang
Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html