Subject: EMF devices - rating system, etc. (Woodley)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 180626 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To: emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org>
--------------------------------------------------
.......This is not so far-fetched.....
Roy Beavers (EMFguru)......
rbeavers@llion.org.......
.....It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness.....
EMF-L web-site can be found at:
EMF-L archives can be found at:
..................PEOPLE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN PROFITS..................
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 16:54:27 -0400
From: "Richard W. Woodley"
To: rbeavers@llion.org
Subject: EMF devices - rating system, etc.
I have had my share of miracle devices promoted to me - at one
time "magic crystals" were the in thing now it seems that countervailing
"safe fields" that fight off the bad fields are the in thing. I have tried
to keep my website as independent as possible from commercial sites
because so many of the fraudulent ones give the few that are legitimate a
bad name. Although some are obvious it is difficult for a layman such as
myself to be sure about the borderline ones where the theory proposed does
"appear" to make sense.
I have a suggestion for a rating system though:
1 - Do you really expect anyone to believe the garbage you are spouting
2 - Interesting idea but a lot more convincing and proof needed
3 - Theoretically logical but still not proven
4 - Shown to reduce or shield fields to a measureable degree
5 - The miracle solution we are all hoping for
********************* Richard W. Woodley *********************
woodley@igs.net *********** http://www.ncf.carleton.ca/~ab190/
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bridlewood Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) Information Service
http://www.ncf.ca/bridlewood-emfinfo/
Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html