Subject:  (Lundquist) Re EMF in the barnyard...... (fwd)
Date:     Mon, 15 Jun 1998 090629 -0500 (CDT)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru@hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 20:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: marjorie lundquist 
To: w-m-a@reach.net
Cc: rbeavers@llion.org
Subject: Re: EMF in the barnyard......

Wolfgang, you are right that, without knowing any field intensities,
we cannot say anything about that aspect of the situation.  What I was
trying to say is that it probably is not enough to pay attention only
to field intensities (based on the results of my theoretical study). 
Interaction effects probably will not register as field intensity; or,
more accurately, as the number of transmitters goes up, the intensity
will have to drop, not just proportionately, but more strongly.
I do understand that these are directional transmitters but this may
not make much difference close to the transmitter, where interaction
effects will be strong, because the field strength which is hazardous
is probably lower than the standard (because interaction effects have
made the field much more hazardous than it otherwise would have been).
As to the practical problem of high population density, we still do
not know how much separation there needs to be between transmitters to
eliminate interacton effects in the practical sense.  So my idea of
moving some of the transmitters to a different tower is not really
such a bad idea, as it may be necessary only to move them a few
thousand meters away (this is only a guess; an experiment must be made
to find out what works).
-- Marjorie
*********************************
Marjorie Lundquist, Ph.D., C.I.H.
Bioelectromagnetic Hygienist
P. O. Box 11831
Milwaukee, WI  53211-0831  USA
*********************************
====================================
---"Wolfgang W. Scherer"  wrote:
>
> Dear Marjorie
> 
> The problem in Germany is 
> there is no space left to place that "other" transmitters.
> 
> It reminds me of the question of US Generals discussing complaints
> about low flying military planes in Germany
> Why don't they fly over the un-populated areas in Germany
> - simply there are none !!
>  (An obviously  incomprehensible fact for born North Americans)
> 
> The average distance from city to city or town  is max 35 miles the 
> average distance from village to village 3 miles ( at least in West 
> Germany)
> Imagine one third of all US people living in Vermont only.
> Or New York City multiplied by 12 in one spot. This may give you a 
> clearer picture.The same "incomprehensible" situation is with that 
> farm. The "size" of a German farm is only about 50 acres on average
> for normal operations -  many have much less. The barn yard is mostly 
> located in villages on about the size of two or three town lots. (The 
> fields are outside the community).
> 
> The multitude of antennas has not necessarily caused the grave 
> problems but the legally allowed field intensity.  
> AS I stated this readings are not in the vet's report - they should 
> be.....! Since they are below the legal limit they are not relevant 
> until this limit is changed !! We try to get info on that .
> 
> This case showes that the allowed levels need to be reviewed 
> urgently. The main problem in my opinion is the PERMANENT 
> uninterrupted transmission. Since the body system has no recovery 
> period whatsoever. I have demanded that over and over that a dosage 
> had to be established - but that would require exposure free time and 
> zones too .
>  The question what problems humans may have in such circumstances 
> have not been discussed in that case,but the problems with humans 
> have been documented elsewhere - with the same symptoms - in New 
> Zealand and B.C. Canada. All those complaints have been dismissed 
> though..
> 
> Commerce comes before the interest of a "single" person
> since there is no place to "move" the farm in Germany - the farmer 
> may be bought out -  like others before for other reasons ( airfield 
> expansion etc) While noise is a recognized factor in Germany EMR has 
> to get this "status".
> 
> The answer why all governments in "developed countries" are so 
> favouring the micro-wave blanket may lay beyond communication needs,
> as the international " Beyond Prisons" Conference in March 1998 at  
> Queen's University in Kingston Ontario Canada has revealed.
> 
> For all who missed that  check my links at
> http://www.reach.net/~scherer/p/cellalrt.htm
> 
> Wolfgang W. Scherer
> 
> http://www.reach.net/~scherer/ 
> ....................................................
> Impossible tasks are resolved immediately
> Miracles take a little more time.
> ..................................................
> 

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html