Subject:  Re Cell phones with shields (fwd)
Date:     Tue, 2 Jun 1998 042521 -0500 (CDT)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru@hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 23:04:57 -0700
From: Robert E Riedlinger 
To: "Roy L. Beavers" 
Subject: Re: Cell phones with shields (fwd)

Hi  Roy  We need you and Dr Cherry. Please don't ever give up.
 Can you imagin where our Governments would be if they were to admit that
they made a mistake when they keep telling us there is no health hazard ?
Sooner or later they will have to.  R Riedlinger
rriedlin@uniserve.com-----Original Message-----
From: Roy L. Beavers 
To: emfguru@hotmail.com 
Date: June 1, 1998 5:48 PM
Subject: Cell phones with shields (fwd)


>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 11:37:48 +1200
>From: "Cherry, Neil J" 
>To: rbeavers@llion.org
>Subject: Cell phones with shields
>
>Dear Roy,
>
>I have been told by an industry source whom I trust, and my own
>understanding of the situation is consistent with this, that a well
>shielded cell phone should be much more efficient as part of the cell
>network.  This is because 60 to 80 % of the cell phone radiation
>enters the users head because of the high conductivity of the head
>compared to free air.  Thus only 20 to 40 % of the radiation is used
>to communicate with the cell site.  A shielded phone, done in an
>appropriate way, can protect the users head, send almost all of its
>microwave radiation to the cell site and reduce the mean power
>necessary to do this because of the greater efficiency.  This is a
>win-win situation all around.  My source also said, and this makes
>sense, that the reason cell phone were not build and marketed with
>shielding was the appearance that this might give that they accepted
>there could be a health risk.  What a very poor reason, especially
>with the evidence mounting of brain tumor incidence with cell phone
>usage, about 10 epidemiological studies associating EMR with
>increased incidence of brain tumor, the Lai/Singh evidence, ....
>
>Regards
>Neil Cherry
>
>**********************
>[Oddly, I recall hearing the same "lame" kind of excuse for 'inaction'
>coming from some electric utility people years ago.  i.e.,  If we agree to
>"prudent avoidance" we will be admitting that there is a hazard......guru]
>
>
>




Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html