Subject: Re Potential Occupational EMF Hazard (fwd) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 085058 -0500 (CDT) From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org> To: emfguru@hotmail.com -------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 08:30:52 +0800 From: Robert LechterTo: "Roy L. Beavers" Subject: Re: Potential Occupational EMF Hazard (fwd) Dear Guru: This gentleman has a problem if he's at 4-16 milligauss. He should get a good measurement first. My biased advise, use a meter such as the CellSensor which is affordable. He can find it at www.tec-health.com. In any case, my brother George has been helping people shield their environments. Find him at www.safelevel.com. Regards, Robert Lechter TecHealth Corp. Roy L. Beavers wrote: > Some expert advise needed here!!!! Notice the Gauss readings!!!..... > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 14:50:48 -0700 > From: "Tanner-Soto, Bobbie L." > To: rbeavers@mail.llion.org > Subject: Potential Occupational EMF Hazard > > I read one of your many articles regarding EMF, but no where did I read > any recommendations to eliminate EMF's in the workplace. The obvious > answer would be to move away from the potential hazard, but I would like > more than just one option. > > My employer is more than willing to work with me to relieve my concerns > regarding my exposure to EMF's in my work area. This leads me to a > question I have been searching for with no answer; I have an electrical > panel adjacent to my work area, is there a shield that can be > installed? What material, requirements, etc. that can be used on my > side of the panel/wall? > > The Goss measurement seems to be low on the average which is > approximately 4-16. The measurement against the wall was well over > 200+. Quite honestly, the integrity of the measurement is questionable. > It was measured by a non-professional in this field, but rather our > Company's safety specialist who borrowed the meter from a local > electrical utility company. My concern is I sit at my work station 8 > hours/day, 5 day/week and I question the long term adverse effects to > the exposure of EMF"s, albeit mild in nature. > > Thank you very much for your time in this matter. > > Respectfully, > Bobbie Tanner-Soto Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html