Subject: Re Roy Beavers' answer about the NIEHS meeting..... (fwd) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 191938 -0500 (CDT) From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org> To: emfguru@hotmail.com -------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 02:15:06 +0200 From: Christoph ReussTo: "Roy L. Beavers" Subject: Re: Roy Beavers' answer about the NIEHS meeting..... (fwd) ......Guru wrote: > Jim, the only question I would accept a "vote" on in this issue is: Would > you (Dr. researcher) be comfortable with allowing your children/grand > children to grow-up living alongside power lines? AND THAT SHOULD BE > TAKEN BY SECRET BALLOT!! -- so that honest "gut feelings" could be > expressed. That is also the kind of question that forces a judgment on > the basis of the ***total weight of the evidence***, rather than the "we > have not yet conclusively proved" formulations that have typified results > reported about this issue so far.... .......Christopher: A vote with the above question among spin-doctors would still lead to everyone voting 'Yes' (i.e. EMFs are harmless), because - they want that the ballot result will be a 'Yes' vote, and - they know that even if they vote 'Yes', their children/grand children will NOT have to grow-up living alongside power lines. Cheerio Chris Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html