Subject: Antennas on schools..... Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 091638 -0600 (CST) From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org> To: emfguru@hotmail.com -------------------------------------------------- Some of you have already received this..... Guru has one comment below [......], in the text of the news report. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Subject: Antennas on schools..... EASTSIDE JOURNAL (Bellevue Washington) - March 21st 1998 PARENTS OPPOSE RELAY TOWER ON SCHOOL PROPERTY By Linda Thielke Journal Reporter SAMMAMISH PLATEAU - Would a cellular relay tower at Skyline High School pose a threat to the students? Some parents think so. They are concerned that the proposed 120-foot pole - with wireless communications gear at the top - could fall and hit unsuspecting students, or expose them to harmful electromatic radiation. But the Issaquah School District which plans to allow Western Wireless to install the pole, says the radiation argument isn't enough to stop the project. Under Federal law, "government agencies cannot deny construction of a cell tower for any environmental reason - including health" said Assistant Superintendent Doug Snyder. Issaquah is also negotiating with Western Wireless for a similar communications pole at Sunset Elementary. It would be situated on the hillside next to Interstate 90 and above the playground. The school district would receive about $1,000 a month for each site, Snyder said. He added the district could cancel the lease agreements if there was ever _scientific proof_ that radiation from the structures is harmful.......[Italics by guru.] ["Scientific proof." I will soon be writing a piece for you about that phrase. It is possibly the most dishonest aspect of the entire EMF issue..... As it has been used in the case of the tobacco health hazard, I regard it as the ultimate example of the "complicity" of the science community with the industry vested interests.....guru] School Board President Barbara de Michele said Board Members felt the federal law was clear and that it would be useless to reject Western's offer. "The question was should we be spending money fighting it, or take the income," she said. Other school districts, however, have turned down lucrative offers from cellular communication companies. "We read that law differently," said Bob Collard, director of facilities for the Lake Washington School District. "We think it applies to the permitting agencies, not the landowner." Collard said other school districts have the same property rights as homeowners, who can refuse to have cellular towers installed on their property. "We don't allow it, primarily because of the community's reaction," he said. "We decided, 'why invite the controversy?'" There is a tower on the campus of Bellevue High School that was put up more than 10 years ago, and there is a police antenna on the roof of Cherry Crest Elementary. But in recent years, the Bellevue School District has not allowed towers or antennas on property currently in use. "We're not comfortable doing a long-term lease on a piece of property that's in use," said Pete Wall, Bellevue's facilities director. "It would be like renting out the football field to a farmer to raise hay." King County would also have to approve the poles at the Issaquah school sites before they could go up. ------------------------ Sent by Tom Harman Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html