Subject:  (Coghill) Re Seattle airport cancer (fwd)
Date:     Fri, 12 Mar 1999 024240 -0600 (CST)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org>
--------------------------------------------------

Roger:

John Moulder's role as a "hired gun" ("expert witness") for industry is
well known and has been mentioned here before.....  Rather than undertake
an editing job which would be highly subjective (I fear), I think it is
more important to make sure that everyone knows of his record as an
"industry lackey."  That page of his which your refer to, seems not
to have been updated since he originally posted it 4 or 5 years ago.  I
don't check it much anymore, but has he put the RAPID conclusions on it
yet???

Thanks for the commentary on the Irish airport.....

(I am also interested in your remarking that Ben Greenbaume is there
with Moulder at Wisconsin???  Marjorie, any comment??)

Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
rbeavers@llion.org................
...It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness... 
.................PEOPLE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN PROFITS...............

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 02:29:07 EST
From: Cogreslab@aol.com
To: rbeavers@llion.org
Subject: Re: Seattle airport cancer (fwd)

One can't help but comment that all inflying aircraft will be using
downpointing radar on final approach. We came across the same phenomenon of
excess brain tumours at Crossmaglen, Northern Ireland a few years ago.
Crosmaglen, the seat of intense hostilities between the IRA and British
military forces, became one of the most heavy air traffic movement sites in
the world. (as an aside I wonder what the UK Govt. would say if NATO
threatened bombing London to accelerate the Irish Peace Process, as NATO (sc.
the US) is doing in the Kosovo crisis?).

On another matter whilst writing: The Wisconsin University website run by Dr
Mulder seems a vastly web of misrepresentation of bioelectromagnetics science.
I understand Wisconsin is the site of the ELF transmitters, and research by
the University (e.g. by Ben Greenebaum, editor of the BEMS journal) has
extensively been addressing possible bio-effects from this installation. In my
view Dr. Mulder's site is the most comprehensive I have yet seen and deserves
congratulation for that.  However, there is good evidence of bias in his
approach, and I am asking if other members of this group would assist me in
setting out a corrective picture on my own website
(http://www.cogreslab.demon.co.uk). I suggest we take the Mulder website part
by part and delegate members to read and correct it with
 appropriate value judgements.

Any offers, or is this another job we do ourselves here?!

Best wishes, Roger Coghill




Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html