Subject: (Kelley) (Evans) Re Publicize!!!
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 062807 -0600 (CST)
From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To: emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org>
--------------------------------------------------
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 21:10:55 -0800
From: Libby Kelley
To: "Roy L. Beavers"
Subject: Re: (Evans) Re: Light bulb/radar (fwd)
John:
I like your idea!
I rec'd a poster with a "no" symbol on it (red circle with a diagonal line
running through it) covering up a jumble of towers and antennas. The
message blo says "WARNING - You are living in a non-ionizing radiaiton
zone" I got this from a group in Southern California who were opposing a
large facility of towers and antennas 150 feet at the same level as their
homes!ll The measurements were quite high and there had already been
several deaths and serious health problems. When faced with the facts and
the graphics, the town revoked the permits. The facts - the engineering
report and the calculations which relate tot he kjnown reserach along with
graphics like these or Deb's T-short design, are very effective. I have
noticed a stronger, more intense, reaction from local planning bodies when
I have recently used this approach. My son has accompanied me on these
excoursions.
I am planning a forum at my church as you may know. When I made the first
announcement I used this sign. Some people got very upset and said I was
"biased" - this is supposed to be an educational forum. But it did get
their attention! I live in Marin County - one of the most prideful
counties in the U.S. aobut its open space. One of the most preferred high
tech areas ripe for future developmente. We are facing a mounting clash
between the progrowthers and the non-progrowthers, like me. The wireless
technology here is bieng promoted as an "environmentally safe and
convenient" alternative for people who want to run their furtune 500
corporation out of their home and send high speed digital transmissions at
microwave frequencies - like George Lucas. It is difficult to get them to
stop thinking green - about all the mney they are making, that is. The
forum I am planning was proposed for an "Earth Day is Every Day Award" in
the county. It was denied - an idea whose time has not come yet.
Bedst regards,
Libby Kelley
It is on an easel in the narthex of the church and will be in evidence the
day of the event. I will try to remember to send it once the forum os
over. really, really busy right now.
At 10:21 AM 3/30/99 -0600, you wrote:
>diatioon
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 11:10:51 -0500
>From: "John D. Evans"
>To: "Roy L. Beavers"
>Subject: Re: Light bulb/radar
>
>Dear Roy,
>
>I am re-sending the message I e-mailed to Deb Carney and Cc'ed to you. I
>was hoping that you would post it. As suggested in my note, I am willing
>to act as a gathering center for graphic, startling ideas that might help
>our cause, thus relieving you of having to sort through scads more e-mail
>than you now handle. I encourage any and all on your list to e-mail me
>personally, with some unique ideas that might be used in presentations by
>people opposing the continuing spread of the "blue world disease."
>
>I have slightly changed my message, below, to include all EMF-Listers, not
>just Deb Carney. Many thanks. John.
>
>*****************REPEATED MESSAGE BELOW*****************
>
>
>At 02:21 PM 3/28/99 -0700, you wrote:
>>I read your comments to Roy with interest.
>>How close does one need to be to the radar for the light bulb to go
>>off? I'm 1 mile away from Channel 9's doppler radar and at the same
>>altitude.
>>One prop that worked for us on the mother's march delivering petitions
>>against increasing the EMR in our neighborhood was mice costumes for the
>>children with signs saying they did not wish to be "lab rats".
>>Deb
>>
>
>Dear Deb,
>
>Thanks for your note. When I was a Wireless/Radar Mechanic in the RCAF
>during World War II, radar was considered a very essential tool for the
>Allies. We were not aware of any inherent dangers in working with it; we
>were there to "get the job done." At that time, we used to check out
>airborne radars on workbenches, and we would often have them in operative
>mode. The STUPID, macho trick with the light bulb would be to put the
>screw-in end in one's mouth and walk by (within a few feet) of an operating
>unit. The bulb would come on most anywhere inside the repair building. I
>am not sure how far from a unit one would have to be before the bulb would
>not light up. However, we do know that the radiation density falls off as
>the inverse square of the distance from the radiating element.
>
>With today's radars, the best way to measure the radiation would be with a
>good meter. Perhaps Bill Curry could help you with this. In fact, I am
>most impressed (more like astonished) with the figures Bill sent to us on
>EMF-L when he measured his wife's cell phone.
>
>Your idea of having children dressed up like mice with signs saying, "We do
>not want to be lab rats!" is excellent. Perhaps someone could come up with
>hats that look like guinea pigs. None of us want to be human guinea pigs
>nor lab rats, especially against our will. So, to enhance our plea, we
>should have on hand some pictorial evidence to show what happens to
>laboratory animals when they are subjected to various radiations -- the
>more graphic, the better.
>
>NOTE TO ALL ON EMFguru's LIST: I believe we are limited only by our
>imaginations (or lack thereof) when it comes to publicizing the dangers of
>EMR and EMFs. What about computer animation, for example. A creative
>animator could feature Bill Curry's experiment in measuring his wife's cell
>phone, by showing "clouds of colored vapor" coming out of the various
>sections of the cell phone, as described by Bill. The intensity could be
>represented by different shades of color. As EMR and EMFs are invisible,
>we need to represent them in graphic ways that shake people up. It should
>be possible to represent RF and MW radiation as colored lights, or sounds
>of various pitches and intensities, and/or, of course, as illustrated
>graphs, charts, maps, etc.
>
>We must bring what is invisible, tasteless, odorless, TO LIFE. We must
>graphically illustrate the EFFECTS of EMR and EMFs. We cannot show CAUSE,
>as "cause" is a creation of the human mind; we can only relate what
>event(s) precede an observed effect. Those events that precede "effects"
>are those events that are most meaningful to us. Causes do not exist in
>reality; causes exist only in our imaginations -- by definition. WE HAVE
>TO CRANK UP OUR DEFINITIONS.
>
>Let ALL OF US who are members of EMF-L start our own "think tank" in order
>to develop concepts as to how we can more graphically illustrate the
>dangers of EMR and EMFs. EMFguru does not need any more e-mails coming in
>to him, so I volunteer to receive and collect your ideas; e-mail me
>directly, and I will eventually send the collection to Roy.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>John
>
>P S -- I have already heard back again from Deb Carney with a couple of
>neat ideas: T-shirts with a logo on the front showing a tower that is
>radiating and a crossed circle through it. On the back of the T-shirts is
>their web page address and THREAT spelled out --Tower Hazards and Radiation
>Exposure Above Tolerance. Deb says he is forwarding my message to their
>graphics committee.
>
>Let's think BIG ! ! !
>
>
>**************************************************************
>* John D. Evans, PhD, Retired Professor/Counsellor
>* 8 Monroe Court
>* Wellington, ON K0K 3L0
>* Canada
>*
>* E-mail: jdevans@sympatico.ca
>* Phone: 613-399-5089
>*
>* The heart of education is in the education of the heart
>***************************************************************
>
Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html