Subject: HAVERTOWN RESIDENTS VS OMNIPOINT (Ciccone).. Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 134011 -0600 (CST) From: "Roy L. Beavers"To: emfguru -------------------------------------------------- ......."2,000 times lower than the FCC standards".....??? A lawyer will say most anything...... Remember Bill Clinton...... I just wish there was some way I could make it perfectly clear to all ... that this cell phone antenna (or tower) matter is NOT about "1" tower or "1" antenna ... it is about hundreds of thousands ... it is about a Blue World ... that is getting bluer ... almost by the hour...... And, neither we ... nor our government ... nor the industry (certainly!) ... know what the effects of all that electromagnetically induced biological activity is going to have on human health......!!! Cheerio...... Roy Beavers (EMFguru) roy@emfguru.com .....It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness..... NEW!!! Website... http://emfguru.com ...................People are more important than profits................. Missed opportunity... $$$$$ We could have changed the corrupted system!! $$$$$ McCain !! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:10:57 EST From: Cheryl Ciccone To: rbeavers@llion.org, Subject: NEWSPAPER ARTICLE - HAVERTOWN RESIDENTS VS OMNIPOINT News of Delware County * Haverford Edition, Wednesday, March 22, 2000 CHURCH CELL TOWER PROTESTED By Pat Hartel, Associate Editor OAKMONT- Neighbors of St. George's Episcopal Church on the corner of Darby Road and Ardmore Avenue in Ardmore showed up at the Haverford Township Zoning Board hearing Thursday night to protest the installation of telecommunications equipment by Omnipoint Communications, Inc. within the bell steeple of the church. In addition, parents of children who attend Children's Ark, the childcare facility located in the church's facilities, also voiced objections to the installation. The hearing had been continued twice. In its first testimony, Omnipoint stated it needs the equipment to guarantee continuous coverage throughout the area. Cheryl Ciccone, a parishioner of the church as well as a neighbor, testified Thursday night to having driven around the area with three different cellular phones and having no difficulty in reaching her home with any of the three: one serviced by Cellular One Communications, one an ATX Communications phone and one, an Omnipoint phone. Although present, Ciccone's testimony in letter form was read to board members by Chairman Evelyn Yancoskie. "I traveled two miles west up Darby Road, north on Route 320, right on Bryn Mawr Avenue, east on Haverford Avenue, back to Ardmore Avenue, then heading south to Ellis, Prescott and over to Eagle Road. There were multiple calls recording a clear signal throughout the area in question." Ciccone's letter said. "This places serious doubt to prior Omnipoint testimony regarding the necessity of the proposed antenna at 1 Darby Road in order to provide adequate coverage," Ciccone said. "There is an existing tower at the Haverford Township office, about 3/4th of a mile from the proposed location. There is also an Omnipoint antenna located at Mercy (Community) Hospital. There will soon be an antenna at the Haverford State College site. The proposed antenna at Ardmore Avenue and Darby Roads will cover less than a mile," the letter continued. "Omnipoint represents a very small percentage of the Haverford residents who use cell phones. Do not compromise our community to compensate for the inefficiencies of Omnipoint's system," Ciccone said. Ciccone also mentioned receiving no word from the church or its rector about the pending installation. "Some neighbors within a half block had no idea this was happening," she said. Neigbors June King and Josephine Pogue, both of Hermosa Lane, testified they had concerns about radiation from the cellular antenna harming the children in the day care center by causing Leukemia. "You have to consider the welfare of the children in the township," Pogue said. "There are 94 children in the Ark and health hazards for this are unknown." When Omnipoint Attorney, George Asimos called Dr. Marvin Ziskin as an expert witness to testify, Dr. Ziskin rebutted any claims that the radiation from the antenna would harm the children. Based on criteria from the National Council on Radiation Protection, he siad, the effect of the cellular emissions from the antenna would be "2,000 times lower than the Federal Communication Commission standards." Testimony was adjourned at 11 p.m. The hearing will be continued but a date has not been set. ### ______________________________________________________ Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com