Subject: Lloyds peril....(guru) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 055740 -0600 (CST) From: "Roy L. Beavers"To: emfguru -------------------------------------------------- Hi everybody: .......One of the major "hidden from the public" stories of the past two decades is this one.... (See below) It has MUCH portent for the EMF Saga....... Lloyds is accused of failing to adequately inform its investors about the extent of its losses on asbestos - over $6 billion!! Now you know ... why the entire insurance industry is leery about insuring the EMF "risk." Always ask - and make them show! - the power companies, telecom companies, etc. - about their EMF liability insurance coverage..... Most don't have it..... Can't get it...... The international insurance industry is probably better informed than ANY government about the **true** EMF risks......?!? Cheerio..... Roy Beavers (EMFguru) roy@emfguru.com .....It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness..... NEW!!! Website... http://emfguru.com ...................People are more important than profits................. Missed opportunity... $$$$$ We could have changed the corrupted system!! $$$$$ McCain !! DO YOU KNOW OF OTHERS WHO SHOULD BE ON THIS LIST??? _________________________________________________________________ 02:43 PM ET 03/13/00 Lloyd's of London Wins Canada Case By BRUCE STANLEY= AP Business Writer= LONDON (AP) _ Lloyd's of London, faced with a potentially crippling lawsuit at home, said Monday it won a victory in a related case in Canada. A Canadian judge has ruled in favor of Lloyd's in its effort to collect $32 million from dissatisfied Canadian investors, the company said. Lloyd's is one of the world's premier insurance markets. The 88 Canadian investors, known as ``Names,'' had accused Lloyd's of acting fraudulently for not informing them of the full extent of losses that Lloyd's faced in the 1980s. Lloyd's lost $12.8 billion from 1988 to 1992, causing financial ruin for many investors and driving about 30 Names to kill themselves. The Canadians were not among more than 230 Names who filed a lawsuit now being heard in London's Commercial Court, but they did make similar allegations of fraud. The lawsuit here alleges that Lloyd's concealed $6.3 billion in claims arising from asbestos-related illnesses in the United States while reserving a tiny fraction of that amount to pay for them. Opening arguments in the case began last Monday. In Canada, Justice Katherine Swinton issued a judgment last Tuesday in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice requiring five of the Canadian Names to honor their debts to Lloyd's. The five had argued that they had been denied a fair trial in Britain and that Lloyd's had violated Ontario law. Swinton ruled their argument insufficient, noting that none had joined the London lawsuit or seen fit to file a suit of their own. An additional 83 Canadian Names said they would abide by the judge's decision. Philip Holden, head of Lloyd's Financial Recovery operations, called Swinton's decision ``a major victory'' in its global debt collection efforts. ``While attention is now being focused on the London court case, it's important to note that Lloyd's is still making significant progress in its debt enforcement activity around the world,'' Holden said in a statement. Lloyd's is seeking to collect $585 million from a total of 1,600 Names. The Names balked at the terms of a financial reorganization at Lloyd's in 1996 and refused to pay a premium to cover their losses. There was no immediate comment on the Canadian ruling from participants in the London case. Their lawsuit, which seeks damages of up to $237 million, poses a potentially lethal threat to Lloyd's. The suit could destroy the reputation Lloyd's has cultivated over its 312-year existence and, if successful, could clear the way for claims of fraud from many others. About 95 percent of the Names at Lloyd's accepted the 1996 reorganization and paid their premiums. Lloyd's is a self-regulating market of insurance syndicates rather than a company in its own right. It relies on more than 4,100 Names _ mostly private individuals _ who provide the money for underwriting insurance. _________________________________________________________________ Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com