Subject: ANTIOXIDANT THERAPY FOR ELECTRICAL HYPERSENSITIVITY (Beal).
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 192732 -0600
From: Roy Beavers
To: guru
--------------------------------------------------
...........From EMF-L..........
Thanks to Jim Beal for this....... (I wager there will be some feedback.....)
......guru.......
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: ANTIOXIDANT THERAPY FOR ELECTRICAL HYPERSENSITIVITY
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 17:03:07 EST
From: EMFEFFECTS@aol.com
To: roy@emfguru.com (Roy L. Beavers)
Roy: Here's a report that just came in on MedScape. Nice try, but no
results with antioxidants (which figures, if the mechanism of EHS is
metabolism effects due to thyroid resistance at cell receptor interface,
e.g., cell receptors stopped up with heavy metals or pesticide-type
chemicals). Some of the refs look interesting (enclosed). You may want to
post this so others can review it and obtain the references for background.
These researchers seem to accept that the EHS syndromes are not entirely
"just psychological" (!) and are trying to find out what works and what
doesn't!
Jim Beal
EMF Interface Consulting
#######
THE EFFECT OF SUPPLEMENTARY ANTIOXIDANT THERAPY IN
PATIENTS WHO REPORT HYPERSENSITIVITY TO ELECTRICITY: A RANDOMIZED
CONTROLLED TRIAL
Swedish study tests the hypothesis that antioxidant therapy reduces
symptoms and improves health in patients reporting hypersensitivity to
electricity.
MedGenMed, March 23, 2001
http://psychiatry.medscape.com/35315.rhtml?srcmp=psy-032301
Lena Hillert, MD, Birgitta Kolmodin-Hedman, MD, PhD, PeterEneroth, MD, PhD,
Bengt B. Arnetz, MD, PhD; Department of Environmental Health,Stockholm County
Council; Division of Occupational Medicine, Department ofPublic Health
Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; Unit for AppliedBiochemistry,
Clinical Research Centre, Novum/Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge;Section of
Social Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences,Uppsala
University, Sweden
[MedGenMed, March 23, 2001. © 2001 Medscape, Inc.]
ABSTRACT
Context: Hypersensitivity to electricity is a proposed environmental illness
of unknown etiology. Patients report a variety of symptoms that they relate
to electric equipment. The afflicted individuals suffer from ill health. Many
interventions have been tried but, to date, there is no one specific
treatment that has been proven superior to other remedial actions. In
general, there is a lack of controlled prospective studies.
Objective: To test the hypothesis thatantioxidant therapy reduces symptoms
and improves health in patients reportinghypersensitivity to electricity.
Design: Randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlledstudy.
Setting: Patients referred to the Environmental IllnessResearch Centre,
Stockholm County Council.
Patients: Sixteen patients reportinghypersensitivity to electricity.
Intervention: Antioxidant supplementation(vitamins C and E, selenium). Main
outcome measures: Self-reported symptoms andreported degree of
hypersensitivity to electricity, serum levels of uric acidand
diphenylpycrylhydrazyl (DPPH).
Results: The results indicated no significantdifferences in reported
symptoms, reported hypersensitivity to electricity, oroxidative status in
serum between periods of antioxidant and placebotreatments. Serum levels of
DPPH and uric acid showed no correlation with thereported degree of symptoms
or hypersensitivity to electricity.
Conclusions: The study did not show anybeneficial effect of antioxidant
supplementation for patients reportinghypersensitivity to electricity. The
results do not support the hypothesis thatoxidative stress is a major
contributor to ill health in patients who reporthypersensitivity to
electricity.
12 Pages, 29 references
References
1.American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) Board of
Directors. Idiopathic environmental intolerances. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
1999;103:36-40.
2.Cullen MR. The worker with chemical sensitivity: an overview. Occup Med
State Art Rev. 1987;2:655-662.
3.Kreutzer R, Raymond NR, Lashuay N. Prevalence of people reporting
sensitivities to chemicals in a population based survey. Am J Epidemiol.
1999;150:1-12.
4.Graveling RA, Pilkington A, Geroge JPK, Butler MP, Tannahill SN. A
review of multiple chemical sensitivity. Occup Environ Med. 1999;56:73-85.
5.Bergqvist U, Vogel E, editors. Possible health implication of subjective
symptoms and electromagnetic fields. A report by a European group of experts
for the European Commission, DG V. Solna, Sweden: National Institute for
Working Life; 1997 (Arbete och Hälsa 1997:19).
6.Department of Environmental Health. Miljöhälsorapport 1998 (Report on
environmental health 1998, in Swedish). Stockholm, Sweden: Department of
Environmental Health, Stockholm County Council; 1998.
7.Knave B. Electric and magnetic fields and health outcomes - an overview.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994;20(special issue):78-89.
8.Lonne-Rahm S, Andersson B, Melin L, Schultzberg M, Arnetz B, Berg M.
Provocation with stress and electricity of patients with "sensitivity to
electricity." J Occup Environ Med. 2000;42:512-516.
9.Flodin U, Seneby A, Tegenfeldt C. Provocation of electric
hypersensitivity under everyday conditions. Scand J Work Environ Health.
2000;26:93-98.
10.Bergqvist U, Hillert L, Birke E. Elöverkänslighet och hälsorisker av
elektriska och magnetiska fält. Forskningsöversikt och utvärdering.
(Electromagnetic hypersensitivity and health risks from electric and magnetic
fields. A research review
and evaluation. In Swedish, English summary.) A report to the Swedish
government. The Swedish Council for Work Life Research. November 2000.
11.Halbert SC. Diet and nutrition in primary care. From antioxidants to
zinc. Prim Care. 1997;24:825-843.
12.Hollán S. Free radicals in health and disease. Haematologia.
1995;26:177-189.
13.Smith O. Cells, stress and EMFs. Nat Med. 1996;2:23-24.
14.Ushakova T, Melkonyan H, Nikonova L, et al. The effect of dietary
supplements on gene expression in mice tissues. Free Rad Biol Med.
1996;20:279-284.
15.Lambrozo J, Touitou Y, Dab W. Exploring the EMF-melatonin connection: a
review of the possible effects of 50/60-Hz electric and magnetic fields on
melatonin secretion. Int J Occup Environ Health. 1996;2:37-47.
16.Burch JB, Reif JS, Yost MG, Keefe TJ, Pitrat CA. Reduced excretion of a
melatonin metabolite in workers exposed to 60 Hz magnetic fields. Am J
Epidemiol. 1999;150:27-36.
17.Åkerstedt T, Arnetz B, Ficca G, Paulsson LE, Kallner A. A 50-Hz
electromagnetic field impairs sleep. J Sleep Res.1999;8:77-81.
18.Jansson B. Behandlingsförsök med psykofarmaka (Treatment with
psychopharmacological drugs, in Swedish). In: Ramel C, ed. Seminarium om
elöverkänslighet (Symposium on hypersensitivity to electricity, in Swedish).
Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Swedish Academy of Science; 1993:25-28 (KVA report
1993:2).
19.Hillert L, Kolmodin-Hedman B, Söderman E, Arnetz BB. Hypersensitivity to
electricity; working definition and additional characterization of the
syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1999;47:420-438.
20.Dinis TCP, Madeira VMC, Almeida LM. Action of phenolic derivatives
(acetaminophen, salicylate, and 5-aminosalicylate) as inhibitors of membrane
lipid peroxidation and as peroxyl radical scavengers. Arch Biochem Biophys.
1994;315:161-169.
21.Ames BN, Cathcart R, Schwiers E, Hochstein P. Uric acid provides an
antioxidant defense in humans against oxidant- and radical-caused ageing and
cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:6858-6862.
22.Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials. A Practical Approach. New York: John Wiley &
Sons; 1997.
23.Spencer AP, Stier Carson D, Crouch MA. Vitamin E and coronary artery
disease. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1313-1320.
24.Arnetz B, Berg M, Anderzén I, Lundeberg T, Haker E. A nonconventional
approach to the treatment of "Environmental Illness." J Occup Environ Med.
1995;37:838-844.
25.Andersson B, Berg M, Arnetz BB, Melin L, Langlet I, Lidén S. A
cognitive-behavioral treatment of patients suffering from "electric
hypersensitivity." J Occup Environ Med. 1996;38:752-758.
26.Hillert L, Kolmodin Hedman B, Dölling BF, Arnetz BB. Cognitive
behavioural therapy for patients with electric sensitivity- a
multidisciplinary approach in a controlled study. Psychother Psychosom.
1998;67:302-310.
27.Bergdahl J. Psychological aspects of patients with symptoms presumed to
be caused by electricity or visual display units. Acta Odontol Scand.
1995;53:304-310.
28.Eriksson N, Höög J, Sandström M, Stenberg B. Facial skin symptoms in
office workers. A five-year follow-up study. J Occup Environ Med.
1997;39:108-118.
29.Weaver VM. Medical management of the multiple chemical sensitivity
patient. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol.1996;24:S111-S115.
Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com