Subject: Re Response from New Zealand....... (fwd)
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 202241 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To: emfguru@hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 18:57:34 -0600
From: Deb Carney
To: "Roy L. Beavers"
Subject: Re: Response from New Zealand.......
I would very much appreciate an email of your file on prudent avoidance. We
plan to start showing our community the information on health effect and EMR
because we face the addition of more towers. Thank you so much.
Deb Carney-CARE-Golden, Colorado
Roy L. Beavers wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 10:23:50 +0000
> From: ibeale
> To: rbeavers@llion.org
> Subject: Re: adding more members (fwd)
>
> > Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 11:15:14 -0500 (CDT)
> > From: "Roy L. Beavers"
> > Reply-to: "Roy L. Beavers"
> > To: emfguru@hotmail.com
> > Subject: Re: adding more members (fwd)
>
> Roy,
>
> I am responding to Deb's inquiry (below) and in particular her
> situation with regard to RF exposure. Last week i gave evidence at
> a New Zealand Environment Court hearing on this issue, as did Drs
> Bruce Hocking (Melbourne) and Stephen Cleary (Virginia Medical
> College). We pointed to recent evidence of adverse effects of
> chronic exposure at levels around 1microwatt/cm2 and argued the case
> for caution and prudent avoidance in the siting and operation of
> broadcasting and narrowcasting transmitters. If Deb (or anyone else)
> wants to see my evidence, i can email the file (Word6, PC) to them.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ivan Beale
>
> > Hi everybody:
> >
> > There are pros and cons to what Debbie suggests in her message below....
> > (Short info bios to tell readers about qualifications of contributors to
> > this list.)
> >
Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html