Subject: ATTENTION!!!, Safe level of EMR is ZERO (Cherry)..
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 185112 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Roy L. Beavers"
To: emfguru
--------------------------------------------------
........Folks -- this is an HISTORIC announcement.....!!!
I appreciate that Dr. Cherry has chosen to share this with us.
Most of you will not be attending the meetings in Europe which he
refers-to here..... Guru will.....
I dare-say that Dr. Cherry's statement below will cause some serious
reverberations in the smug 'circle' of the INDUSTRY "science"
defenders..... (The Moulders, Stuchlys, et al., whom many of you
have sent me messages about, recently.....)
And, I predict that you will be referring to this proclamation for years
to come into the future.....
Finally -- as at the Alamo -- the "line in the sand" has been drawn on the
issue of EMR/health effects..... It has been drawn concisely, clearly and
without the usual protective "spin" on behalf of the vested interests.....
The public, the legitimate and unbiased medical community, the regulators,
and the governments can all read and easily understand what follows ...
without any excuses to equivocate or dissemble the facts.....
(Press people. You ARE free to make use of this release....... You might
also want to review guru's "Mission Statement" posted on the home page of
the website..... It foretold such an event ... "perhaps sooner rather
than later.....")
Cheerio......
Roy Beavers (EMFguru) You gotta SHOWME -- I'm from Missouri....
roy@emfguru.com
.....It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness.....
NEW!!! Website... http://emfguru.com
...................People are more important than profits.................
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 10:01:49 +1200
From: "Cherry, Neil J"
To: rbeavers@llion.org
Subject: Safe level of EMR is ZERO
Dear Roy,
I am about to leave for Europe where I am presenting the results of
my latest research into low level health effects of EMR as requested
by representatives at the European Parmiament and our very good
friends in Salzburg City Council.
The conclusion of my research is that:
Electromagnetic Radiation is damaging to Brains, Hearts, Embryos,
Hormones and Cells.
It is therefore a threat to Intellegent Hearty Life.
Electromagnetic radiation resonantly interacts with bodies and cells,
Interfering with cell-to-cell communication, cell growth and
regulation, and is damaging the genetic basis of life.
Like other toxic substances that damage cells, EMR has a safe
exposure level of ZERO. (through many dose response relationships
from exposures from ELF, RF and MW)
Hence my recommended Target Public Exposure for significant risk
reduction is 10 nanoWatt/sq cm. This can be accomplished by setting a
maximum outdoor exposure at the boundary of properties of 0.1
microWatt/sq cm.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This will not be liked nor accepted by cell phone companies and many
government and international authorities, such as ICNIRP and WHO (Dr
Michael Repacholi for example). However, it is based on a large set
of internationally published, peer-reviewed papers from a wide range
of indepentent universities and research institutes. It also includes
the results of studies funded by industry, e.g. Repacholi et al.
(1997), Phillips et al. (1998).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another important conclusion: Cell phone radiation mimics the effects
that we have found for EMR across the spectrum, in over 45 published
studies showing adverse biological and human health effects
specifically from cell phone radiation.
A cell phone against the head exposes the premier organ of the human
body to serious interference with its processes and serious damage to
its tissues and cells. The exposure levels on average are higher than
military personnel who show highly significiant cancer, cardiac and
neurological effects for radio and radar exposures (Robinette et al.
(1980) and Szmigielski (1996)).
Cell phones and cell sites are producing significant health effects
right now but few direct studies are attempting to identify them. You
only see what you look for. If nobody is looking then nobody will
see anything.
I had a call from a resident yesterday who had developed severe
arthritis in the period immediately following the installation of a
cell site 50 m from his house. He is in a high exposure regime over 2
microwatt/sq cm. Burch et al. (1998) have shown that cell phone usage
reduces melatonin. There are 14 studies showing that EMR reduced
melatonin in people. I looked up Dr Russell Reiter's book (Reiter and
Robinson (1995)) on melatonin. It lists several illnesses that
result from reduced melatonin. The first (p8) is arthritis, then
diabetes, cancer .....
A great deal of illness and death currently occurring in developed
countries, can be associated with the progressively increased
exposures to EMR, especially in the RF/MW range because this is much
more biologically active and damaging than ELF fields, Bawin and Adey
(1976), Vignati and Guiliani (1997). This is going to increase very
significantly with the use of cell phones and the installation of
cell sites.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
My problem is that there is so much research that shows adverse
biological and health effects, but there is a conserted campaign to
ignore, discredit or attack the messengers. The studies are not
generally known by authorities who trust bodies that appear to be
reliable but who deliberately mis-quote and mis-represent the
published research. This continues to delay measures to protect
public health by retaining the strongly misproven assumption of
tissue heating being the only effect.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Warm Regards to you and all on the list.
Neil Cherry
Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com