Subject:  Neil Cherry will appear in Ireland (O'Connell)..
Date:     Sun, 14 May 2000 185746 -0500 (CDT)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" 
To:       emfguru 
--------------------------------------------------



........Dr. Cherry discusses briefly some of the information he
will present in Ireland.....  It sounds like the IEGMP group should
attend.....!!

They reached a conclusion which implies that there is no such evidence....

Ah well ... that was the Repacholi conclusion....  (Remember:  "exposures
to RF radiation below the NRPB or ICNIRP do not cause adverse health
effects...."  That was the one that must always be said first ... when
bowing  to Mecca......)  

Well, it seems that there is much more to come out, yet, about the
Repacholi role in that group ... and how he got included....  We will be
covering that (I believe) in the coming week....

Cheerio......  (Interesting, below.......)

Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
roy@emfguru.com

.....It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness.....
                    NEW!!! Website... http://emfguru.com
...................People are more important than profits.................
                           

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 00:05:33 +0100
From: COLETTE O'CONNELL 
To:         
Subject: Fw: 

  URGENT
Neil cherry will give a presentation in Dublin on the 19th June next, 2,000.
Colette has a video made of involuntary muscle "flickers"/spasms,
caused by GSM transmitters 400 metres from her home.  (See Dr. Cherry below
for "scientific" explanation of this phenomenom.)
This is available to all.  Those of you abroad please let me know of type of
video tape required.  Feel free to use this tape and accompanying statement
in any way.

Colette

----- Original Message -----
From: Cherry, Neil J 
To: COLETTE O'CONNELL 
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 10:17
Subject: Re:


> Dear Colette,
>
> The equipment I need is just and overhead projector.
>
> I like the simple old fashioned equipment. I'm not into powerpoint
> yet.
>
> Thank you for your document on Dr Repacholi. In the Expert
> Committee's report it dismisses calcium ion efflux as an effect. In
> Vienna in 1998 Dr Repacholi publically agreed with Dr Carl Blackman
> that calcium ion efflux was an estabished biological mechanism from
> low level exposure to EMR. He immediately stated that this did not
> imply a health effect. Carl Blackman challenged him on this saying
> that he was re-writing history, because calcium ion research started
> with reaction time change, EEG change and then calcium ion change, as
> an evidence trail.  In Vienna Michael also said that there was no
> evidence that GSM cell phones caused any adverse effects. When the
> chairman of the conference challenged him because he presented his
> mouse study at the conference, Dr Repacholi said that it wasn't
> evidence until it had been replicated. The conference disagreed. A
> study is evidence. Replication is confirmation of a biological effect.
>
> Time is flying by. My presentation at the New Zealand parliament was
> well received with a little media coverage.  It is a long slow road
> to changing people's minds. I now have over 40 studies showing
> adverse effects from cell phone radiation. One shows significantly
> increased mortality and one significantly increased brain tumour on
> the side where the phone is used. This is the 99th group showing
> increased brain tumour from EMR exposure and the 46th showing a
> significant increase.
>
> Warm Regards
> Neil
>




Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com