Subject:  Basic answers (fwd)
Date:     Sat, 29 Nov 1997 050319 -0600 (CST)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@mail.llion.org>
To:       emfguru@hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------

Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii
Content-ID: 

Hi everybody:

Alhough I am unable to forward Dr. Ed Maxey's attachments (some of
our engineers may want to obtain them from him)  ... I do believe
his remarks below (to Dr. John Goldsmith) should be circulated to
all.......

Cheerio.....

Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
rbeavers@llion.org..............http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html
................................It is better to light a single candle ...
than to curse the darkness...............................................

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 22:47:17 -0800
From: Edward Maxey 
To: gjohn@bgumail.bgu.ac.il
Cc: rbeavers@mail.llion.org
Subject: Basic answers

Dear John Goldsmith,

Presumably you are a mathematician.  Poisson distributions are not
taught in medical schools.  Apparently they were not taught to the
epidemiologists at NCI either.  But the purpose of this is to thank you
for your insightful remarks about EMFs and ALL.

EMF exposure is quite unnecessary.  The attached photos are of a net
current control on a distribution line in Texas (pcoil.jjpg) and one
attached to a home here in Arkansas (coil3.pcx).  Such devices literally
suck return current back into neutral lines instead of allowing it to
flow in multiple ground paths.  Strategically employed 95% of powerline
EMF exposure would be eliminated.  No, I do not sell such devices.

Surely a few more authorative voices like yours will soon awaken the
populace to the hazard we are needlessly tolerating.  Anyway, let us
hope so.

Thanks again for your kind comments.

Ed Maxey

Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html