Subject:  (Ross) Re (Philips) EMF's and Fluoroscent Lights (fwd)
Date:     Mon, 23 Nov 1998 143528 -0600 (CST)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org>
--------------------------------------------------


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:23:22 -0800
From: Randy N Ross 
To: "Roy L. Beavers" 
Subject: Re: (Philips) EMF's and Fluoroscent Lights (fwd)

> (vi) Having said all that 'damning stuff', in locations where daylight is
> not possible then 'full-spectrum' 'daylight' tubes which include the
> correct amounts of near UV (UVA and some UVB) are necessary if people
> are to keep fit at well.
> Alasdair
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Alasdair Philips    (aphilips@gn.apc.org)
> Director, UK Powerwatch,
> EMC Engineer and EMF-bioeffects researcher
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The "correct amounts" of UV is like saying the "correct amounts" of EMF
exposure.  Too much can kill you.  Since people do not need UV to see (they can
not see it anyway) and since we get too much UV exposure from the natural
environment I would hesitate to recommend the use of "full-spectrum" lamps.

Bureaucrat




Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html