Subject: Citizens prevent tower installation (Kelley)(Philips)..
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 101515 -0600 (CST)
From: "Roy L. Beavers"
To: emfguru
--------------------------------------------------
......This sounds to me like the LAN technology -- somewhat "beefed up."
Of course, while there have been some "uncertainties" about the health
effects of LAN -- particularly when used to link computers, etc., in
schools -- as in all of this Blue World "explosion" in our environment,
no REAL (INDEPENDENT) research has been done.....
How do you like being experimented upon???? Wasn't there something
about NOT doing that ... in the recent U.N. resolutions???.....
The U.N worries about the U.S. not paying its U.N. dues (which amount to
about one-third of the total budget; an **outrageous** portion of the
total) -- there is much more the U.N. should be asking the U.S. about???
Worldwide EMF contamination....
But, as long as the U.N. bureaucrats get THEIR salaries paid (by the
U.S.), they are not going to embarrass the U.S. with questions about
what the U.S. sponsored Blue World may doing to the health of the people
of the planet?????
(And, of course, that good old industry-friendly watchdog of the health of
the world -- the WHO -- is also a part of that same U.N. bureaucracy, paid
by the "vested interests" of course.....)
The PEOPLE of the world, it now seems clear, have no idea how much control
over their own health, life and destiny has already been forfeited to the
few [mostly international corps] that control the $$$$$$$$$$$$!!!
Cheerio......
Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
roy@emfguru.com
.....It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness.....
NEW!!! Website
...................People are more important than profits.................
DO YOU KNOW OF OTHERS WHO SHOULD BE ON THIS LIST????
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 15:03:26
From: Alasdair Philips
To: "Roy L. Beavers"
Subject: Re: Citizens prevent tower installation (Kelley)
WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
You think the world is already "Blue" ~ you ain't seen nothing yet
I have just come from talking at an international two-day Mobile Phones
and Health conference held in Whitehall, London.
It is the universal (world-wide) intention of the cellular phone
industry to eventually have a low powered microcell antenna within
about 200 yards of EVERY HOUSE in every town, village and city in the
developed world. Their planned next generation cellular service can
only work if they achieve this. The fewer large masts an urban area has
the faster they will come in to that area with the street lampost masts.
You need a new base station for about every 500 subscribers in busy
call traffic areas. They are already trying to put up these masts in
the UK within 5 metres of childrens' bedroom windows ~ with the antennas
only a couple of yards higher than the window opening.
Next generation cellphones will have full video facilities and wide
bandwidth internet services (over 1 MBit/sec).
Sorry to be a bearer of bad "blue world" news.
Alasdair
At 02:48 12/11/99 -0600, you wrote:
>
>......."An empowering experience," said one resident.... The tower
>would "devalue" property said the appraisal expert....
>
>Roy Beavers (EMFguru)
>roy@emfguru.com
>
>.....It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness.....
> NEW!!! Website
>...................People are more important than profits.................
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 14:32:09 -0800
>From: Libby Kelley
>To: rbeavers@llion.org
>Subject: Citizens in Ridgewood, New Jerseys prevent tower installation
>
>
>Bergen Record (Newspaper)
>
>DOT drops bid for cell tower in Ridgewood
>
> Thursday, November 11, 1999
>
> By EVONNE COUTROS
> Staff Writer
>
> RIDGEWOOD -- Faced with local opposition, the state
> Department of Transportation has abandoned a proposal to
> construct a 120-foot cellular
> tower along Franklin Turnpike and Route 17 south.
>
> "The department will honor the community's request and the
> facility will not be
> built," said DOT spokesman John Dourgarian on Wednesday.
>
> The mayor and council voted unanimously Tuesday to oppose
> the plan for a wireless communications structure on
> state-owned land. The tower, strongly
> opposed by neighbors, would have been leased to carriers.
>
> "It was an empowering experience for the residents," said
> Councilwoman Jane Reilly, who has opposed the plan since
> its proposal in March. "They came
> forward as a united neighborhood and were successful in
> opposing the tower."
>
> Robert Lanni of Westfield Avenue lives 1,400 feet from the
> site. The computer programmer is one of about 50
> concerned residents who attended
> Tuesday's council meeting.
>
> "What it means for us is that it protects the land and the
> property values," Lanni said. "As a group of residents,
> we got together and realized how it
> affected our families and ourselves and we would not stand
> for it and let things
> slip by without having our voice."
>
> The Transportation Department had sought the village's
> consent to construct
> the lattice-type tower in a DOT maintenance yard. The
> 10.29-acre parcel also
> houses a park-and-ride lot, shuttle bus service to Newark
> Airport, and a dome for road salt storage.
>
> The department held a hearing on the proposal Sept. 13,
> after which residents
> pressured village officials to oppose the tower.
>
> The council's resolution states that the village
> commissioned an appraiser "and
> his conclusions support the assertions of the property
> owners, that to permit
> the tower would substantially devalue properties in the
> immediate area."
>
> It also said that at the September hearing the village
> heard nothing about the
> "possibility of electromagnetic interference, which could
> affect the health-care
> facilities which are located on property adjacent to and
> near to the state property."
>
> There also was little testimony regarding the danger of
> ice falling from the
> tower, the resolution states.
>
> Village officials said wireless service is available in
> the area "perhaps with
> some gaps, perhaps with some static, but that the service
> currently existing is
> substantially better than mediocre."
>
> Reilly agreed with residents' demands.
>
> "I couldn't see a benefit so great that would outweigh the
> egregious imposition
> on the neighborhood," she said.
>
> Copyright © 1999 Bergen Record Corp.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Libby Kelley
>Executive Director
>Council on Wireless Technology Impacts
>aka ~ Ad Hoc Association of Parties Concerned about
> the FCC's Radiofrequency Radiation Health and Safety Rules
>____________________________
>Website: http://www.ccwti.org
>Phone - 415-892-1973
>Fax - 415-892-3108
>Address:
>936-B Seventh Street, PMB 206
>Novato, California 94945
>
>
Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com