Subject:  Home Owners Insurance (Beth)..
Date:     Wed, 3 Nov 1999 023011 -0600 (CST)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" 
To:       emfguru 
--------------------------------------------------


Beth:

It sounds to me that they don't want to be responsible for your
litigation cost -- if you are sued by the telecom companies.....

It is not unusual for such "liability protection" to be written as
a separate policy....

Similarly  (it has been reported), most insurance companies are
unwilling to insure the risk of law-suits on behalf of the telecom
companies -- where EMF damages (to health or property) are alleged.

I say again -- as I stated recently -- the insurance industry has
(apparently) figured out that the potential litgation costs on this (EMF)
subject are too high for that industry to provide any insurance where EMF
damages may occur....

I say "apparently" because this is not the kind of information that is
being made public.  One simply has to "surmise" on the basis of many
reports like yours....

Guru.....

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 10:48:12 -0600
From: devisalv@mindspring.com
To: rbeavers@llion.org
Subject: Home Owners Insurance

Here's a question for all.

My home owner policy (of 10 years) was canceled in August for superficial
reasons. My new policy was canceled for no apparent reason other than they
thought my home was a trailer, which it is not, nor does it look like one.
My new policy is being issued and they want to add an addendum regarding no
liability if we are sued for any reason. I suspect that my policies are
being canceled because of the two towers behind my home.

Has any one else experienced this?

Beth in Austin




Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com