Subject:  Re EMF and the law (Teule).
Date:     Mon, 13 Nov 2000 042638 -0600
From:     Roy Beavers 
To:       guru 
--------------------------------------------------

..........Response from EMF-L........

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: EMF and the law (Teule).
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:56:38 +0100
From: creuss@bluewin.ch (Christoph Reuss)
To: teuleger@wxs.nl
CC: roy@emfguru.com

On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Gerrit Teule wrote:
> In our Groundlaw, the most important law
> that we have, it says in art. 11, that we have the "right of untouchability
> of our body (except when it is regulated by law in antother way)". The
> normal rule is untouchability.
...
> According to this law one should have the right to say: I do not want to be
> artificially radiated, whatever the consequences may be (damage or no damage).
> The scientific proof for "biological effects" seems to me easier to give than
> scientific proof for damage.

Well, with such a rigorous interpretation of the law, you could also prohibit
any cars/trucks from passing anywhere near your house (or in towns at all),
because car exhaust fumes cause cancer and other health problems, and that
is scientifically proven.  Seems the problem is practicability, alas.

Cheerio,
Chris


P.S.: The "Groundlaw" is called constitution in English.


Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com