Subject:  Re Living next to cellular tower (Kennedy)(Kane).
Date:     Sat, 25 Nov 2000 194935 -0600
From:     Roy Beavers 
To:       guru 
--------------------------------------------------

........Yes -- something to think about!!........guru......

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Living next to cellular tower (Kennedy).....
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 18:15:18 -0800
From: "robert c. kane" 
Reply-To: rkane@tds.net
To: roy@emfguru.com
References: <3A2036B5.C487EE8@emfguru.com>

Perhaps this is a suitable opportunity for the legal types to ponder the
prospect that introducing a cell tower onto a property previously leased
for residential use voids the lease.

Roy Beavers wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> ..........From EMF-L........
> 
> Somebody who can help, please talk to this guy......  We are now
> getting two or three
> of these per week......  ........guru.......  (These folks never seem
> to have time to study
> my website.)
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Living next to cellular tower
>    Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 15:00:57 EST
>    From: Kennedysebo@aol.com
>      To: roy@emfguru.com
> 
> Thank you for your responce to my letter dated 11-23-2000 "Living next
> to
> cellular tower" I guess my next question is, what can I do to protect
> myself
> from these effects and is there any legal steps I can take against
> AT&T
> and/or my landlord whom are profiting from this cellular tower? The
> reason
> i'm asking is that I was never informed by AT&T or my landlord of
> these risk
> factors that could be caused by this cellular tower. I just come home
> one
> evening and the construction crew was digging.


Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com