Subject: MICROWAVE ANTENNA too close?? (Curry). Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 123603 -0500 From: Roy BeaversTo: guru -------------------------------------------------- .........From EMF-L...... Bill Curry's answer to a question about a "close by" MW antenna should be seen by all....... Thanks, Bill......guru..... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Fwd: MICROWAVE ANTENNA] Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:30:38 -0500 From: "Bill P. Curry" Reply-To: BPCurry@MCS.com Organization: EMSciTek Consulting co. To: roy@emfguru.com References: <39EC84E2.1A32AADE@emfguru.com> Roy and Armand, The amperage rating of the antenna doesn't really give you enough information. They are saying that the current must never exceed that value. You need to know the actual power put into the anenna and the gain characteristics of the antenna. Probably, the antenna focuses the radiation into specific directions, and the amount of focusing is indicated by the gain. This means that if the antenna's maximum gain direction points toward you, you will receive more radiation than if all the radiaiton were emitted equally in all directions. As a general rule, if you can see that the pod is pointing toward you, you are probably in the region of maximum gain. Also, 100 feet seems to me to be too close to the anenna to be safe, if it is pointing at you. To be able to estimate the radiation density and thus have a means of comparing your estimate with published tables of biological effects that have been found at various radiation densities, you need at least the following minimal information: 1) frequency of the radiation, 2) maximum power of the transmitter into one channel, 3) maximum number of channels that will likely be active simultaneously, 4) antenna gain as a function of direction in both horizontal and vertical planes. The best way to get equivalent information is to try to find what municipal agency approved the installation of the antenna and get a copy of the application that was required for approval. This should give you the type of transmissions (e.g., analog cell phone, digital PCS in the U.S. or GSM in Europe), frequency, perhaps transmitter manufacturer and model number, antenna manufacturer and model number. Knowing this information, one can usually get the antenna gain pattern from the manufacturer, and the application will probably tell you either the maximum gain or the Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) or the Effective Radiated Power. From all this information pus the horizontal and vertical distance between you and the antennas, the radiation power density at your location can be calculated for comparison with power densities known to produce specific biological effects. If you can get this information, I will be happy to perform the radiation density calculations for you, gratis. Also, you can find some of the reported biological effects resulting from irradiation at various power densities at www.ccwti.org. Click on the tab marked "science." These tables are currently being updated. Good luck. Roy Beavers wrote: > > Bill: > > What do you think??? .....guru...... > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: MICROWAVE ANTENNA > Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:45:44 EDT > From: Sharmie@aol.com > To: ROY@emfguru.com > > THE ANTENNA DIAGONALLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM IS HAS A 200 AMP RATING WITH > THREE PODS POINTING IN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS FROM EACH CORNER OF A FIVE STORY > BUILDING ROOF TOP THAT OCCUPIES A FULL SQUARE BLOCK. > WE ARE IN A HIGHRISE CONDO BUILDING ON THE TOP FLOOR, ABOUT 100 FEET DISTANT > FROM THE POD POINTING IN OUR DIRECTION. > DO THESE FACTS SUPPLY ENOUGH INFO SO THAT YOU CAN TELL ME IF THERE IS ANY > DANGER TO US FROM MICROWAVE RADIATION? THANK YOU. YOURS TRULY, ARMAND -- ---- Bill P. Curry, Ph.D. |Physics is fun. EMSciTek Consulting Co. |Trying to make a living! 22W101 McCarron Road, |Phone: (630) 858-9377 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 |Fax: (630) 858-9159 with prior notice Web page: http://www.EMSciTek.com ____________________________________________________ | Analysis, experiment design & software development | | for engineering and the physical sciences | ---------------------------------------------------- Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com