Subject:  Question from Antenna-Free Union (Beaver).
Date:     Wed, 04 Oct 2000 093920 -0500
From:     Roy Beavers 
To:       guru 
--------------------------------------------------



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Question from Antenna-Free Union
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 07:13:00 +0000
From: Christopher Beaver 
Reply-To: idgfilms@earthlink.net
To: roy@emfguru.com
References: <39DB09DF.F1EC17C1@emfguru.com> <39DB0B0F.C28E75AC@emfguru.com>

Dear Roy:

We've been getting e-mail endorsements for our October 15th
demonstration from around the world. Here in San Francisco, it appears
that the number of participants is growing as quickly as we can
circulate word that the demonstration is happening. We were joined
yesterday by a group opposing sixteen wireless internet antennas to be
constructed on one building adjacent to apartments by a company named
Metro Comm. I'm not certain of the exact spelling of the company name.
Tonight we have an organizational meeting of the Antenna-Free Union. Our
biggest problem for the moment is finding enough chairs for everyone
planning to attend!!

Please encourage people to keep sending their endorsements. This is a
highwater mark for us and we need every bit of political and spiritual
support we can get.

In the meantime, I have a question for the group. According to Hammett
and Edison, the engineering firm behind many of our finest wireless
installations, the Academy of Art dormitory next to Sprint's proposed
high-powered cellular antennas will be continuously exposed to 75
microwatts per centimeter squared. 

Does the group have comments concerning this level of exposure?

Many thanks to all,

Christopher Beaver


Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com