Subject:  Goldsmith's summary..... (fwd)
Date:     Fri, 11 Sep 1998 054316 -0500 (CDT)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To:       emfguru@hotmail.com
--------------------------------------------------



.......Here is a portion of a message I received recently from
Peter Heindl in South Africa.  I think his comments about the
Goldsmith report from San Francisco may be of interest to many
of you (particularly the medical people).......guru......

     _________________________________________________________________

Reply-To: "Peter Heindl" 
To: "EMFguru" 
Subject: Fw: (San Fran) Goldsmith Report 9/7/98 (fwd)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 18:51:35 +0200

   -

Hello Roy,

thanks for the INFO !!

May I put this message on the Web? - Or does it occur somewhere already?

Best regards
        Peter


P.S.:
I whole-heartedly agree with the statement that regardless of the radiation
(NON-ionizing or ionizing) the body/organs/cells are still affected
'similarly'. - Just look at my list of illnesses (linked to Geopathic
Stress) and you will see QUITE a number of those you may find in connection
with NON-ionizing radiation.

Offered as tantalizing comments discussed more fully in his written
material, Dr. Goldsmith challenged many preconceptions throughout his
presentation including the notion that there is a clear dividing line
between the effects of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. He also
stated his belief that the thermal/non-thermal dividing line in
discussions of radiofrequency exposures is no more than a red herring,
a distraction from our understanding of the actual health effects of
radiofrequency radiation.










Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html