Subject: NIH, Public Particpation (fwd) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 152826 -0500 (CDT) From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org> To: emfguru@hotmail.com -------------------------------------------------- ......Bill and Gretchen, Many thanks for the following. I think everybody should see it. Possibly some of our people in the D.C. area can take in this meeting. Bert??......Actually, I have a pretty good opinion of Donna Shalala (Secty. of Health). I might rate her on a par with Janet Reno as the two top people in the Clinton Administration. But I fear that this EMF "thing" is too far down in the Bureaucracy for her attention. It shouldn't be!!! It will perhaps be a much bigger health matter than lead, asbestos, dioxin, perhaps even tobacco -- within about another decade. It is clearly coming fast. And no attempt is even being made to measure its potential consequences.....guru...... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 14:43:52 -0500 From: Bill Curry & Gretchen FlemingTo: "Roy L. Beavers" Subject: Public Particpation Roy, so much has been said about the lack of responsiveness of the Federal Agencies such as NIH to public needs and perceptions that I thought I should send you this announcement. This came to my wife at her office and she forwarded it to me. Incidentally, I will send you an abridged version of my notes on the Tucson meeting as soon as I get them in order. I have more than 10 pages of hand written notes, so I will need to condense them for your readers. Bear in mind that I only attended half of the meeting. The only way I could a cheap air fare was to come home on the 15th, instead of the 17th. Staying the full time would have cost me $350 more airline fare. Isn't it crazy the way airline pricing is done! [Bill, sorry, I left the above para in on purpose. I'm sure the "cost" considerations are big for most all of us "activists." Of course, these meeting costs are no problem for the RICH health bureaucracies and their _expense account_ PhDs, etc......The real BIG SPENDERS at these meetings are the vested interests!......As usual, only the public is (but for sacrifices like yours) unable to attend.......We eagerly await your Tucson report!!!.....guru....] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Working Group on Public Participation in NIH Activities; Notice of Meeting The Office of the Director (OD), National Institutes of Health (NIH), announces a meeting on public participation in NIH activities. The meeting is scheduled for September 23, 1998, from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m., Conference Room 10, Building 31C, Sixth Floor, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland. At the meeting, individual public participants invited by the NIH will discuss future activities and responsibilities of the proposed NIH Director's Council of Public Representatives, and the NIH Offices of Public Liaison. The NIH is the lead Federal agency that provides major support for medical research leading to the improvement of the nation's health. The NIH Director's Council of Public Representatives will serve as a forum for discussing issues and concerns and exchanging viewpoints that are important to NIH policies, programs, and research priorities. The NIH Offices of Public Liaison are expected to strengthen collaboration between the NIH and the public. Establishment of the Director's Council of Public Representatives and the Offices of Public Liaison were recommendations from the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine's report--Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improving Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. The full text of the report is available on-line at the following site of the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/nih/. Future activities will follow from the NIH's Office of Public Liaison and the Director's Council of Public Representatives. The entire meeting is open to the public; however, seating is limited and will be on a first-come, first-served basis. There will be an overflow room available to listen to and view the proceedings of the meeting. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the contact person listed below in advance of the meeting. Individual public participants invited by the NIH will be asked to express their views on matters related to the following: Director's Council of Public Representatives What should be the responsibilities and activities of the Director's Council of Public Representatives? What is the role of this Director's Council of Public Representatives as compared to the role of other NIH Advisory Councils? Describe some activities that could be undertaken by the Director's Council of Public Representatives to encourage and improve public participation in NIH programs. What processes, mechanisms, and criteria should be used for identifying appropriate candidates to serve on the Director's Council of Public Representatives? The NIH Offices of Public Liaison What should be the responsibilities and activities of the NIH Offices of Public Liaison? Should all of the Institute-level Offices of Public Liaison perform the same activities? How should the activities of the OD Office of Public Liaison differ from those of the Institute-level Offices of Public Liaison? How should NIH make the existence of the Offices of Public Liaison known and to whom? How should the Offices of Public Liaison reach out to draw the public into NIH activities? What programs and activities should the Offices of Public Liaison consider that have been particularly successful in providing public viewpoints to the NIH? Additional Questions What should be the relationship between the Offices of Public Liaison and the Director's Council of Public Representatives? What programs from other research agencies or organizations could serve as models for either the Director's Council of Public Representatives or the Offices of Public Liaison in involving the public more effectively in NIH activities? What do various segments of the public need and want to know about the NIH's activities, research, and operations that could be imparted through the Director's Council of Public Representatives or the Offices of Public Liaison? How can the Director's Council of Public Representatives and/or the Offices of Public Liaison help in conveying this information to those segments of the public? Identify activities to disseminate information about and from the Offices of Public Liaison and the Director's Council of Public Representatives to the appropriate public audiences. Discussion of these questions will help NIH in identifying people to serve on the Director's Council of Representatives and will be used by the Director's Council of Public Representatives and the Offices of Public Liaison to identify activities and frame the issues for discussion at future public meetings. Public comments and requests for additional information should be mailed to Ms. Anne Thomas, Associate Director for Communications, National Institutes of Health, Building 1, Room 344, Bethesda, MD 20892. Dated: September 2, 1998. Anne Thomas, Associate Director for Communications, NIH. Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.feb.se/EMF-L/EMF-L.html