Subject:  Nanoose Decision 200pm Sept21 (Fogal)....
Date:     Sat, 18 Sep 1999 084359 -0500 (CDT)
From:     "Roy L. Beavers" 
To:       emfguru 
--------------------------------------------------


.......Canada has not become East Timor, yet........

Connie Fogal is persevering in her valiant fight to maintain Canada's
integrity and respect.....  I repect what she is doing.  

Roy Beavers (EMFguru)......
rbeavers@llion.org.......
.....It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness.....
EMF-L web-site can be found at: 
EMF-L archives can be found at: 
..................PEOPLE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN PROFITS..................

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 20:02:08 -0700
From: Connie Fogal 
To: synaxis@new-ostrog.org
Subject: NanooseDecision 2:00pmSept21

The Human Rights Institute of Canada, Archbishop Lazar Puhalo of the 
Ukrainian Orthodox Archdiocese of Canada, Citizens Concerned About Free 
Trade, Rose-Marie Larsson, Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee, and 
Constance Fogal were in B.C. Supreme Court September 17,1999  to ask for an 
order setting aside the transfer of the Nanoose Bay lands from BC to the 
federal government.

The B.C.Supreme Court hands down its decision Tuesday Sept 21,1999 whether 
it will overturn the Nanoose Bay land transfer from BC to the Federal 
government pending a full hearing on the legality of the expropriation.

The federal government formally took possession of the land today, Friday 
September 17,1999. It did  so by order in council made September 14,1999 by 
which the government reduced the number of days the federal crown is 
supposed to wait before taking possession of the base from 90 days to 1 day.

So what is the big hurry? What great defence need exists that propels our 
federal government ahead so fast? Is there a promised deal  already made 
between our executive branch of government and the United States that 
overrides the duty our government has to us, its citizens?

Once again it is not our elected representatives making these decisions 
that run roughshod over us. Our Parliament is not even sitting.It is only 
the Prime Minister, his cabinet  and a small number of bureaucrats 
directing the lawyers acting for them using the taxpayers money to oppose 
the Citizens.

The main argument of the federal government lawyers on behalf of the 
government is that we, the citizens, have no right to ask the court for 
protection. (The Standing issue.). But, they say,  even if we do, it is too 
late because the feds have already done the deed by chopping their required 
waiting time from 90 days to 1 day. (The mootness issue). You see, the Rule 
of Law does not apply, apparently, to the feds.

Tune in sometime after September 21 to find out whether the BCSC has the 
will to find in the interest of the citizens.

If you can get there , it is important that you be there.

2:00 p.m Tuesday September 21,1999
  800 Smythe St Vancouver BC.
Courtroom to be assigned on September 21.

(We were moved five times today before they finally found a courtroom big 
enough to accommodate  us for the hearing of our application.)

Remember, the struggle continues past September 21,1999. Our show of 
growing strength is very important for all of us. It makes a difference. 
These bureaucrats in the executive arm of government who advise and direct 
government make their living by virtue of paycheques from our tax dollars. 
Similarly,  the few  decision makers who are elected receive their 
paycheques from our tax dollars. It does not hurt for us to remind them of 
that. Canada has not become East Timor, yet.

Quizz of the day: What issue did the press gives most coverage?
Medical research on the size of infant penises? Or citizens in court to get 
back their sovereignty?


Connie Fogal








DEFENCE of CANADIAN LIBERTY COMMITTEE/LE COMITÉ de la LIBERTÉ CANADIENNE
C/0 CONSTANCE FOGAL LAW OFFICE, #401 -207 West Hastings St., Vancouver, 
B.C. V6B1H7
Tel: (604)687-0588; fax: (604) 872 -1504 or (604) 688-0550;cellular(604) 
202 7334;
  E-MAIL    cfogal@netcom.ca; www.canadianliberty.bc.ca

“The constitution of Canada does not belong either to Parliament, or to the 
Legislatures; it belongs to the country and it is there that the citizens 
of the country will find the protection of the rights to which they are 
entitled” Supreme Court of Canada  A.G. of Nova Scotia and A.G. of Canada, 
S.C.R. 1951 pp 32



Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com