Subject: Re Another "George Orwell" story (Whitehead)(Philips). Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 062117 -0500 From: Roy BeaversTo: guru -------------------------------------------------- ..........Response from EMF-L......... Alasdair's remark about the possible role of **ELF** frequency signals (in the cell phone handsets) is VERY interesting....... In part, because the telecom industry may be the origin of that idea.......guru....... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Another "George Orwell" story (Whitehead). Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 10:44:14 From: Alasdair Philips To: roy@emfguru.com CC: rewhitehead@netzero.net Roy This is one time where I agree with the manufacturers! The reason WE are concerned with non-thermal effects is because they ARE non-thermal, i.e. not based on POWER, but on informational signal levels. Some (MOT) Star-Tac phones, with very low SARs, seem to be among the worst offenders for producing headaches, etc. Also, SARs do not take into account the very real ELF magnetic field pulses (up to 60 mG!) due to battery current surges 100 or 217 times every second due to the pulsed nature of the emissions from all TDMA (i.e. GSM, PCN, etc) phone handsets. SARs are just one indicator and I am sure the intention with SARs on boxes/phones is to lull the public into a false sense of safety. The manufacturers KNOW that SARs are only a part of the story and I know some of them suspect the ELF magnetic field pulses are a major part of the reported headache and memory problems. Good wishes Alasdair >Hi Roy: > >This item from "Wired News" may make you laugh (or might make you want to >cry), but in any event, I think it will make you somewhat suspicious of >their motive >as I am. > >Richard Whitehead >rewhitehead@netzero.net >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Measuring the Cell Phone Risk by Elisa Batista From Wired News >3:00 a.m. Sep. 5, 2000 PDT > >In a move to assuage fears that cell phone use can cause brain cancer, >three phone manufacturers are trying to create a standard to measure >radiation emissions. > >Consumers may be misled to believe that lower specific absorption rates >(SAR) mean less risk to potential hazards, say officials at Motorola (MOT), >Nokia (NOK ), and Ericsson (ERICY). > >They are concerned that new guidelines requiring the labeling of SAR levels >on phone packaging will lead consumers to believe that lower levels equal >lower risk. >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Alasdair Philips, BSc(Eng), DAgE, MIAgE Director, UK Powerwatch, (aphilips@gn.apc.org) EMC Engineer and EMF-bioeffects researcher http://www.powerwatch.org.uk ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com