Subject: Re The Scandal of Schwarzenburg (Gaigg)(Curry).
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2000 100855 -0500
From: Roy Beavers
To: guru
--------------------------------------------------
.........Response from EMF-L.......
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: The Scandal of Schwarzenburg (Gaigg).
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2000 09:32:50 -0500
From: "Bill P. Curry"
Reply-To: BPCurry@MCS.com
Organization: EMSciTek Consulting co.
To: roy@emfguru.com
References: <39B0CD63.986FA3AC@emfguru.com>
Roy and Leopoldine,
I would like to know how Herr Jacob views the presentation about
Schwarzenburg that was presented at the Salzburg conference. Does he consider
that this presentation was an acuurate portrayal of the events there and the
plight of the people? Also, is 0.9 GHz the fequency that was always used
there or was ther a lower frequency in the early years? The resaon for this
question is the fact that the absorption coefficient in human tissue is about
2.5 times higher at that frequency than it is at, say, 100 MHz. Specifically,
at 900 MHz (in the range of cell phone frequencies) the absorption coefficient
for brain tissue (grey matter) is about 0.25 / cm.
Also, I wonder if Herr Jacob would share with us the measurements that he
obtained in several of the "hot spots" where the directionality of the
antennas, the terrain and other factors resulted in a concentration of RF
energy above what would be expected from a simple source over level terrain.
Dr. Neil Cherry's presentation at Salzburg included measurements that he made
at Sutro Tower in San Francisco (which has at least 50 antennas on it), and he
also observed these hot spots, as well as regions where the radiation appeared
to "roll" down the mountain.
I made a few informal measurements and also discovered that there were hot
spots along residential driveways near the top of Mt. Sutro, near and below
the tower. I suspect that our usual belief that, at ultra high frequencies
radiation does not follow terrain, is somewhat incorrect. Actually,
Sommerfeld's treatment of ground waves (published during 1909-1925) does not
forbid the occurrence of a ground wave at high frequency, but its intensity is
diminished relative to that of the sky wave. When you are close to the
transmitter, the near field effects are really more complicated than our
conventional beliefs, and only a complicated computer calculation that takes
into account terrain variation can do the job. Such a code was developed by
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory over a period of many years for the
U.S. Navy to analyze the complex electromagnetic environment aboard a warship.
This code is called NEC (Numerical Electromagnetics Calculation), and it
exists in various commercial forms that can be run on PC's. I have a version
called MININEC that uses simpler boundary conditions (Fresnel coefficients)
than those used in NEC (Norton-Sommerfeld). This means that MININEC can handle
the fields that are farther away from a boundary surface than about 0.2
wavelength, but NEC is required to make calculations closer to the surface
than 0.2 wavelength. At 0.9 GHz, the wavelength is about 33 cm, so a
calculation using Fresnel coefficients would be sufficient to determine the
fields where people live. Even so, such problems have to be greatly
simplified to be tractable. A computer code that could handle completely
three dimensional terrain would be required. Nevertheless, I wonder whether
any attempt was ever made to use such a code to estimate the radiation
environment around Schwarzenburg.
Roy Beavers wrote:
>
> ...........From EMF-L..........
>
> When I read this, I read (again) the story of Lookout
> Mountain........ It is the story of
> ordinary people desperately trying to catch the attention of an
> (unknowing) indifferent
> public and a (knowing!!!) government that is not concerned about the
> public's plight.....
> It is concerned only with the selling of governmental favors to remain
> in power......
> .......guru........
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: The Scandal of Schwarzenburg
> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 21:17:19 +0200
> From: "Leopoldine Gaigg"
> To: "roy beavers"
>
> Dear Roy May be that nt you are interested too in the following text,
> written by Hans-U. Jakob, Schwarzenburg: Best regards
>
> Leopoldine
>
> Thereīs no end about the scandal of Schwarzenburg
>
> The telecommunications industry wants to forget Schwarzenburg as
> quickly as possible. Schwarzenburg had showed with shocking clearness,
> that the most praised limits in the HF-field are completely
> unsuitable, because they are protecting the industry instead of the
> people. The population of Schwarzenburg had got to the bottom of this
> Hokus-Pokus, thanks to the help of some courageous engineers and
> technicians, and they have forced the break-down of the
> short-wave-transmitter of Radio-International without compensation.
> The population also could not be impressed by the exercise-landing of
> anti-terror-units by high-capacity-helikopters. At 29. 3. 1998 at
> 01.03 the lights of the transmitter definitively were switched off.
>
> The very beginning of the short-wave-transmitter Schwarzenburg goes
> back to 1938. At this time the installed wattage was 15kW and it was
> intensified during the following decades to 1200 kW. The quantum
> raising followed at the beginning of the "cold war", at the beginning
> of the 1950s, when the giant directional antennas with 3 fences of a
> length to 3500 meters and to 120 meters high were constructed.
>
> Herewith we can understand also the evidence of the political
> importance of this transmitter. The emissions of the
> Swiss-Radio-International were – Eastern-Europe excepted –
> appointed mainly for the non-European territories. Until to the end of
> 1944 the news and comments about operations of Hitlerīs army were
> reserved and strictly controlled, but this changed abruptly, when it
> was sure, who will win the war. To be still up to date in
> radiophonical and political way, it was necessary to pull up to the
> level of the Western propaganda transmitters. The transmitter was
> managed in order of the government by Swisscom, alias Telecom alias
> PTT (further called telecommunication-companies)
>
> Transmitted was by directional antennas with extremely sharp focusing
> rays in exactly defined directions at defined times of the day resp.
> night.
>
> The 5 main-emission-rays were working normally at the following terms:
>
> Far-Eastern 65 ° 10.00 - 17.00 h Near-Eastern 125° 17.00 –
> 20.00 h
>
> Africa 185 ° 07.00 – 10.00 h and 20.00 – 23.00 h
>
> South America 245 ° 23.00 – 01.00 h Northern America 305°
> 01.00 – 07.00 h
>
>
>
> The short wave uses the ionosphere-reflection, which ist with an
> extreme loss . Therefore it has to be emitted with an intensity, which
> cannot be obtained by the other telecommunication.
>
> The short wave radiation is emitted horizontal. It doesīnt follow the
> earth curvature and rises up to the ionosphere. The ionosphere is an
> electrical conducting sphere in a distance of 250 – 400 to the
> earth and it is reflecting the ray (angle of incidence = angle of
> reflection) back to the surface of the earth. The surface of the earth
> again is reflecting back to the ionosphere. So it is possible, to get
> by some jumps of a length of 3000 – 6000 km, to continents far
> away. Because of the earth curvature the emitting ray of Schwarzenburg
> has a gradient angle of only 6°. In big distance to ionosphere this
> one could electrically be heighten in case of needs by max. 11 ° This
> gradient angle, also called elevation, was not able to climb over the
> range of hills in a careful way. 40 % of the emitted power remained
> hanging between the hills of this landscape. The so ray treated
> population was complaining for many years about heavy health problems,
> like extreme numerous cases of cancer, deformities and miscarriages,
> depressions and suicides.
>
> The author of this report has been living in the direct neighbourhood
> to this population and wrote down his observations and experiences in
> different publications. During the last 10 years he used measuring
> instruments of the value of about 25 000 sfr. and because of this, he
> has got thousands of measuring results und has discussed with hundreds
> of afflicted people. By this activity, the Swiss Government Protection
> was not amused at all, and because of this there was arranged a not
> exceeded supervising by telefone and wireless, an observation, an
> engagement of informers and travelling preachers, who had to inform
> the population, that all, what was told about injuries of health,
> initiated by rays, only was sowjetic propaganda and the author a well
> educated KGB-agent.
>
> With the end of the "cold war" also the practices of the Swiss
> Government Protection were unmasked, and the population began, to
> organize the opposition against the transmitter. At first by a
> petition to minister Ogi, the former Chief of the
> transmitter-operators, to go ahead finally with a scientic study about
> the situation near the transmitter, and later, when the cheating of
> this study was known, in the organisation Schok = "Schwarzenburg ohne
> Kurzwellensender" (= Schwarzenburg without short wave transmitter)
>
> The science had played a dusky part during the health investigations.
> Even today it is not clear, if the scientists international chipped in
> at these cheatings or if they were led by the nose by the members of
> the telecommunication companies and technocrates, who were over-
> represented in all the groups of studies.
>
> But it is sure, that the main edition from August 1995 was an ordered
> study, payed by the telekommunication companies. Typical is also, that
> the 150page edition was available only in English, because of the
> afflicted people only about 0,5% can understand a little bit English
> and the telecommunication companies published only a palliative short
> edition in German. There is an insistent warning to use this short
> edition. Even in the English version you have to read "between the
> lines".
>
> Just even the concept of this study shows a great cheaping. While it
> was generally known, that there existed 5 main emitting rays , they
> made a circle around the antenna with a radius of 1 km (zone A) and
> the population living in it, was charakterized as strong exposed, the
> population inside the circle of a 2-km radius as medium exposed. It
> was not beared in mind, that in a territory in form of a circle beside
> of 5 ray exposed sections there were of course 5 non ray exposed
> sections. The only purpose of this method was, to keep the average
> values as low as possible. They also ignored, that on the hills around
> the antenna in a distance of 3-9 km , there were places with stronger
> load (intensity) of rays than in other settlements 750 m in front of
> the antennas. The higher load resulted by the fact, that the hills
> were situated higher than 100-800 m than the base of the antenna an
> jutted into the ray which was similar to a reflector. This phenomenom
> was strictly denied by the physicists. Elder employies of the
> telecommunication company told against it, there is not such a noise
> to be made, because this has been well-known since 30 years. Other
> measurements than these of the author of this report which were able
> to confirm this phenomenom have been prevented. What was not allowed
> to be, that did not exist.
>
> Some time, during the tests, the scientists must have noticed, that
> they were exactly moving in a circle with all their investigations,
> instead of setting course to the 5 emission-rays, and they asked for
> the emission times and the emission directions in form of a map. This
> map is shown at page 37 of the main study and it is a grandious
> falsification, it couldnīt have made more stupid than in this way.
> There non ray treated regions at once were made to ray treated regions
> and the contrary. Low ray treated were made to high ray treated. In
> addition to this, the emission times were put off etc. Insiders hardly
> are not surprised, that in this way for the production of melatonin of
> the pineal gland for human being and cows were chosen the wrong
> probands.
>
> To protect the interests of the telecommunication companies of course
> those were the right ones. So the stable, where they took the spittle
> of the cows was this one, which was most protected against the
> electromagnetic fields, which could be found around the transmitter in
> a radius of 2km.
>
> For all those described cheapings, which are in the description above
> only the famous top of the iceberg, the following disastrous situation
> was found:
>
> troubled sleep 5:1
>
> psychic illness 4:1
>
> cancer (all kinds summed up) 3:1
>
> diabetes 2:1
>
> Not imageable, what would have resulted, if the study would have be
> made without any mistake! Moreover, only the living population was
> encluded. Causes of death and life expentansy never were clarified.
> Compare the study on page 62 of the main study!
>
> Science today only accepts troubled sleeps. For other studies, the
> number of probands was too less, are their arguments. In that way,
> this is not possible! Prof. Dr.med Frenzel-Beyme qualified this view
> as narrow-mindedness. It can be agreed to this, especially because the
> author of the report knows very well, that the proposional numbers
> were always the sames over 3 generations. Therefore, the credit for a
> study of mortality 35 years back will be demanded at the National
> Foundation.
>
> Very important is the fact, that the view of illness above, appeared
> among the population, which was exposed by field-strength of factor
> 7-10 times below the valid immission limit for short wave transmitter.
> That means at E=0,4 – 4V/m an H = 1-10mA/m
>
> Summary in relation to the coming mobiltelecommunikation
>
> The limits in the field of EM-load in high-frequency are not suitable,
> useless and careless. If there would be fixed a safety factor of 50,
> what ist usual among doctors and engineers with sense of
> responsibility, the limits, which WHO, ICNIRP and BUWAL wants to
> "sell" us, would be too high, in minimum with the factor 3500. A
> factor 10, how the responsible BUWAL-official in charge himself just
> now is going to spread as plan, is completely useless.
>
> Around transmitter towers, by the author of this report, were taken
> measurements in a distance of 50m still E-field limits of1V/m.
> Although we are here, with only 2,5% away from the limit (at 0,9 GHz)
> in the middle of the space, where arised alarming health damages. For
> all that, the transmitter installation of Schwarzenburg was situated
> 0,75 – 1,5 km away from residential settlements. In the contrary
> of this, they put the antennas into the middle of these settlements.
> And with that the low wattage is compensated.
>
> We agree, that the radiation of antennas is another kind of radiation.
> But because it is pulsed with Flankensteilheit of 50 micro seconds, it
> is much more toxical (percussion drill-effect) than the short
> wave-field with ist relative soft audio frequency modulation.
> Moreover, with the pulsation of 217Hz – 1,74Hz weīll come back
> to the short wave technology, known as damaging pulsation in audio
> frequency field.
--
----
Bill P. Curry, Ph.D. |Physics is fun.
EMSciTek Consulting Co. |Trying to make a living!
22W101 McCarron Road, |Phone: (630) 858-9377
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 |Fax: (630) 858-9159 with prior notice
Web page: http://www.EMSciTek.com
____________________________________________________
| Analysis, experiment design & software development |
| for engineering and the physical sciences |
----------------------------------------------------
Archive provided courtesy of WaveGuide, http://www.wave-guide.org
Reprinted with permission of Roy Beavers, http://www.emfguru.com